|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loyalty, Filial Piety, and Multiple “Chinas” in the Japanese Cultural Imagination, 12th – 16th Centuries |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Zhang, Chi (著)
|
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2019.01 |
|---|
| ページ | 183 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Columbia University |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://www.columbia.edu/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | New York, NY, US [紐約, 紐約州, 美國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 学位 | 博士 |
|---|
| 学校 | Columbia University |
|---|
| 学部・学科名 | East Asian Languages and Cultures |
|---|
| 指導教官 | Haruo Shirane |
|---|
| 卒業年 | 2019 |
|---|
| キーワード | Japanese literature; Chinese literature; Japanese literature--Chinese influences; Filial piety in literature; Loyalty |
|---|
| 抄録 | This project explores Japan’s complex literary and cultural negotiation with China from the twelfth through the sixteenth centuries, focusing on the role of intermediary texts (dictionaries, encyclopedias, and commentaries) and the different modes of receiving and constructing Chinese culture depending on historical periods and scholarly lineages. As the larger process by which Chinese history and literature became part of the Japanese literary culture has long been studied on the assumption that there is direct textual continuity between Japanese texts (in literary Sinitic) and Chinese continental texts, the tracking down of citations, allusion, and references to Chinese source texts has commanded great scholarly attention. Yet this assumption obscures other, equally important histories – such as a popular understanding of Chinese culture, or a conceptual perception of Chinese culture, that was NOT based on direct textual continuity – that lies at the heart of this project.
The introduction outlines three modes of receiving and constructing Chinese literary culture in pre-modern japan. One was the text-based, canonical view of Chinese history and literature, which relied almost exclusively on texts and genres that were canonized in the Nara and Heian periods state university (daigakuryō) – Confucian classics, Chinese official dynastic histories, and Chinese poetry. In contrast with it was a more popular, name-based understanding of Chinese culture that emerged from various intermediary genres (such as anecdotal literature, dictionaries, encyclopedias, and commentaries) both in China and in Japan. This mode of reception and construction was not based on texts so much as on what I call “cultural signs” (particularly Chinese names, well-known anecdotes, and visual cues) and required no knowledge of the original literary Sinitic. Third was a conceptual, term-based perception, manifested in such concepts as “loyalty” and “filial piety.” Written in the same kanji characters, these terms served as common threads linking Chinese and Japanese literary writings on the one hand, but also took on new meanings and associations in the Japanese cultural imagination.
Chapter 1 outlines the importation of Chinese books and manuscripts in relation to the center of scholarship and the main intellectual groups up until the twelfth century. Drawing on evidence from commentaries on the Wakan rōeishū (The Collection of Japanese and Chinese Poems for Recitation, 1013) and from The Tales of China (Kara monogatari, late Heian period) on the themes of exile and loyalty, I discuss the rising interests in referencing anecdotal literature and compiling intermediaries (dictionaries, encyclopedias, and commentaries) in the twelfth century that eventually contributed to the formation of a more popular, name-based understanding of Chinese history and literature.
Chapter 2 investigates the Japanese medieval interpretations of Chinese official histories (“Chūsei Shiki”), which features a tension and negotiation between the canonical and the non-canonical texts and gravitates towards recurring themes, character types, and core values. In particular, I look into the themes of wisdom, virtue, loyalty, and filial piety in A Miscellany of Ten Maxims (Jikkinshō, 1252) and The Tales of the Heike (Heike monogatari, ca. 1308-1311), which were largely constructed from a relatively more classical, Tang-based perspective, in despite of the fact that Chinese Song dynasty culture had already been imported to Japan along with the introduction of Chinese Chan (J. Zen) Buddhism in the thirteenth through fourteenth centuries.
In Chapter 3, I examine the Taiheiki (A Chronicle of Great Peace, 1340s-1371), a unique text that acts as a nexus for many themes of this project. Analyzing the use of Chinese tales, maxims and proverbs, and poetry in relation to the themes of loyalty, wisdom, righteousness, and filial piety, I show that, unlike The Tales of the Heike, the Taihe |
|---|
| 目次 | Acknowledgements iii
Introduction 1
Chapter 1: Scholarship in the 12th Century: Aristocrats and Family Learnings, Monks and Temples, and the Rise of and Reliance on Intermediaries 6
Chapter 2: The Popularized Classics in the 13th – 14th Centuries: Chinese Histories and Japanese Anecdotal Literature 45
Chapter 3: An Emerging Interest in the Song Culture in the 14th – 15th Centuries: The Zen Monks and the Taiheiki (A Chronicle of Great Peace) 77
Chapter 4: The Expansion of Knowledge and Audience in the 15th – 16th Centuries: New
Printed Editions, New Vernacular Commentaries, and New Imaginations 120
Afterword 158
Bibliography 160 |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-fmek-3c92 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 40 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2023.05.08 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2024.05.30 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
