|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paramārtha and Modern Constructivists on Mysticism: Epistemological Monomorphism versus Duomorphism |
|
|
|
著者 |
Forman, Robert Kraus-Conrad
|
掲載誌 |
Philosophy East and West
|
巻号 | v.39 n.4 |
出版年月日 | 1989.10 |
ページ | 393 - 418 |
出版者 | University of Hawaii Press |
出版サイト |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 英文=English |
キーワード | Epistemology; Mysticism; Paramartha; Constructivism; Philosophy; Analysis; Yogacara |
抄録 | Modern "Constructivist" Accounts Of Mysticism (Steven Katz,Robert Gimello,Wayne Proudfoot etc.),Which Maintain That Mystical periences Result From The Constructive,World-Building Mental Activities, Are Compared With (9th C. Yogacara Buddhist) Paramartha's Constructivism. Both Argue That Generally Experiences Result From The Shaping Ingluences of Background Set,Beliefs, etc. Modern Constructivists Hold That Such Construction Apply As Described to Mysticism. Paramartha Aramartha However Holds That Constructive Activities Are The Initiating Problematic of the Buddhist Path:in Mystical States They Cease Utterly. Artile Argues for Paramartha, Suggesting that There are two Epistemological Structures:Ordinary (Conditioned) And Mystical (Unconditioned). |
ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
DOI | 10.2307/1399316 |
ヒット数 | 1516 |
作成日 | 2001.06.20; 2002.03.24
|
更新日期 | 2019.05.17 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|