|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Critical Buddhism"(Hihan Bukkyo)and the debate Concerning the 75-fascicle and 12-fascicle shobogenzo Texts |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Heine, Steven
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Japanese Journal of Religious Studies
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.21 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 1994.03 |
|---|
| ページ | 37 - 72 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture=南山宗教文化研究所 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/en/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 名古屋, 日本 [Nagoya, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | 300 |
|---|
| キーワード | Dogen, Kigen Zenji, 1200-1253; Buddhism--study; Buddhist literature |
|---|
| 抄録 | One of the main issues in the recent movement known as Critical Buddhism (hihan bukkyo) is the question of which version of the Shobogenzo represents Dogen authentic philosophical message. Critical Buddhism has rejected the conventional emphasis on the priority of the 75-fascicle version，which contains the famous philosophical essays on
“Buddha-nature” (Bussho) and “Being-Time” (Uji). Instead it emphasizes that the 12-fascicle Shobogenzo, which was written toward the end of Dogen life and contains mainly practical instructions for monks in training, is the real or authentic text because of its critique of original-enlightenment thought and consistent focus on karmic causality. This paper examines the Critical Buddhist view in the light of responses by traditional Dogen scholars. The debate is framed and evaluated in the larger context of Buddhist scholasticism and hermeneutics in which scholars try to reinterpret medieval sources from a classical or foundational standpoint and
in terms of distinctively modern concerns. |
|---|
| ISSN | 03041042 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 1355 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 1998.04.28 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2017.08.24 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
