|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition as Identity, the Identical With or Different From Argument in Bodhicaryāvatāra 8.90–103 (and Elsewhere), and Category Mistakes |
|
|
|
著者 |
Falls, Edward (著)
|
掲載誌 |
Philosophy East and West
|
巻号 | v.72 n.4 |
出版年月日 | 2022.10 |
ページ | 940 - 959 |
出版者 | University of Hawaii Press |
出版サイト |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 英文=English |
ノート | Author Affiliation: University of Tennessee-Knoxville, USA. |
抄録 | Paul Williams critiques Śāntideva's argument, claiming it rests on a category mistake. I suggest that if Williams' critique were sound, then the debate about composition as identity in recent analytic metaphysics would also be nonsensical. My argument is that Williams' objection does not make sense when dealing with absolutely general concepts such as the concepts of identity and parthood. |
目次 | I. Compositional Nihilism in Williams’ Critique of Śāntideva’s Argument 941 II. ID Arguments and Strong Composition as Identity 943 III. The Category Mistake Objection 948 IV. The Absolute Generality of the Identity Concept 950 V. Conclusion 953 Notes 955 References 956 |
ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
DOI | 10.1353/pew.2022.0090 |
ヒット数 | 52 |
作成日 | 2024.03.15 |
更新日期 | 2024.03.19 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|