|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
療疾型文本：金聖歎的《第六才子書》與佛教的懺悔=The Therapeutic Text: Jin Shengtan’s Sixth Work of Genius: Story of the Western Wing and Buddhist Repentance |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
柏艾嘉 (著)=Alia Goehr (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
2023 第九屆漢傳佛教與聖嚴思想國際學術研討會
|
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2023.06.30 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 財團法人聖嚴教育基金會 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://www.shengyen.org.tw/index.aspx?lang=cht
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 臺北, 臺灣 [Taipei, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 會議論文=Proceeding Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| キーワード | 金聖歎=Jin Shengtan; 《西廂記》=Story of the Western Wing; 法身=truth-body; 身體=body; 療疾=therapeutics; 懺悔=repentance |
|---|
| 抄録 | 金聖歎的《第六才子書西廂記》一直被視作是古典戲劇批評的經典文本。不過，文學研究學者們受體裁限制，強調其作為戲劇文本的特性，往往忽略了金聖歎評點中跨體裁與超文學的特性。事實 上，金聖歎在《西廂記》評點中有意地結合了多種體裁的寫作手法，尤其是吸收了不少佛教文本、習俗與思想。可見以戲劇為中心的研究方法有頗多局限性。本文以金本第四本第二折《拷艷》為案例，試以非戲劇中心的方法入手，考察一個戲劇文本作為一個容納多樣經驗的美學形式的可能。結合佛教中懺悔的儀式及其他文本，金聖歎深入地在評點中重新構建了《拷艷》一折，進一步推動了原文中本來點到即止的與療疾相關的線索。金聖歎以評點二次創作，在形式上是混合多元的，即不是純粹的文學的，又不是完全的宗教的。這樣的混合多元文本，筆者將其命名為療疾型文本。 通過讓讀者間接體悟佛教法身，文本也能來實現療疾的可能。事實上，混合多元文本，作為一種文本分析的方法，能被廣泛地適用到金聖歎的各式評點作品中去。同時，正如金聖歎從題目與序言中透露的那樣，《六才子書》既然意在比肩《六經》，或也能為我們提供一種新的類佛經式的閱讀理解方法。
Jin Shengtan’s (1608–1661) Sixth Work of Genius: Story of the Western Wing (1656) has long been appreciated from the standpoint of drama criticism. Literary scholarship’s emphasis on genre, however, tends to relegate the multi-generic and extra-literary features of Jin’s commentary to the sidelines of interpretation or subordinate those features to drama. This is problematic given that Jin Shengtan’s commentary on the Western Wing meticulously associates this work with other genres of writing and, moreover, with a variety of Buddhist texts, practices, and ideas. Taking Jin’s commentary on book 4, act 2, “Interrogating the Amorous” as a case study, this paper considers what it might look like to read the dramatic text not as a representative of its genre, but as an aesthetic form that affords certain forms of subjective experience. Jin Shengtan’s commentary intrusively reworks the form of this act to engage its latent therapeutic potential through association with other literary works as well as the Buddhist practice of repentance (chanhui). The outcome of Jin’s commentarial reworking is a hybrid textual form, neither purely literary nor strictly religious, which I describe as the therapeutic text, the potential of which is activated through the reader’s aesthetically mediated apprehension of the Buddhist truth-body. This hybrid textual category is in fact applicable to all of Jin Shengtan’s commentarial works, which I propose constitute a new program of Buddhist hermeneutics that he presented as a complement to the Six Classics. |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 37 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2024.10.09 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2024.10.09 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
