|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
天臺宗山家與山外之爭評述=Comment on Shanjia-Shanwai Debate of T'ien-t'ai |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
王磊
|
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2006.08.30 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 吉林大學=Jilin University |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jlu.edu.cn/newjlu/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 長春, 中國 [Changchun, China] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| 学位 | 修士 |
|---|
| 学校 | 吉林大學 |
|---|
| 学部・学科名 | 宗教學 |
|---|
| 指導教官 | 邱高興 |
|---|
| 卒業年 | 2006 |
|---|
| キーワード | 天臺宗; 山家; 山外; 觀心論; 別理隨緣; 色具三千 |
|---|
| 抄録 | 本文主要側重于探討狹義的山家、山外之爭。全文分為三個部分:山家與山外之爭的背景,山家與山外之爭的內容及山家與山外之爭的影響。在第一部分即山家與山外之爭的背景中,我們從天臺宗典籍的回復、智顗與湛然的分歧、迥然不同的學風三方面進行了分析,認為上述的種種原因導致了山家與山外的爭論;在第二部分即山家與山外之爭的內容中,我們分別闡述了三個問題,觀心論、色具三千和別理隨緣。這部分是本文論述的重點,亦是理解天臺宗山家與山外之爭的關鍵,因為這部分內容反映了山家與山外對天臺宗的認知;在文章的最后部分,我們闡述了山家與山外之爭的四方面影響:天臺宗法統的重建、天臺宗多樣化的發展、天臺與凈土的融合、天臺宗與禪宗的爭論。統而觀之,山家與山外之爭在事實上確立了山家的正統地位,在爭論中兩家分別從自己的角度詮釋了天臺宗思想,對擴大天臺宗思想的影響、深化天臺宗思想的研究都有重要意義。
With the internal development of T’ien-t’ai, the most notably Shanjia-Shanwai debate arose in Northern Song Dynasty. As a big argument in history of T’ien-t’ai, Shanjia-Shanwai debate is important for our research. It can help us to understand abstruse theory of T’ien-t’ai and to see its profound influence.This essay mainly expounds Shanjia-Shanwai debate in three parts. First, the background. Second, the content. Third, the influence.Shanjia-Shanwai debate had its own special background. At the beginning, some scriptures which had lost many years were carried back overseas. And they had different ideas to some sutra. In addition, Shanjia was in Hangzhou while Shanwai was in Ningbo. So they had different school discipline because of their different conditions. Last but not the least, the little discrepancy between Chih-i and Chan-jan resulted in the controversy.In fact, Shanjia and Shanwai opposed in many aspects. But the most essential deputes were three. They were mind-observation theory,particular noumena obeys to conditions and one billion worlds in form. In mind-observation theory, Chih-lih thought that mind had two sides——Noumenon-contained and phenomenon-con- tained, so was sarva-vastu^ni. In Chih-lih’s opinion, mind made sarva-vastu^ni. Chih-lih used explanation in Mo Ho Chih Kuan to tell us that one-thougt was phenomenon-contained. So he emphasized to meditate“Yinshi”. Furthermore, he advocated that we should observe mind step by step. On the contrary, Shanwai believed in oberserving true-mind. In the debate of one billion worlds in form, Shanjia agreed with the notion that‘dharma-realm’contained each other. |
|---|
| 目次 | 前言6-7
一、山家山外之爭的背景7-11
（一） 天台宗典籍的回复8-9
（二） 智顗與湛然的分歧9-10
（三） 迥然不同的學風10-11
二、山家山外之爭的內容11-21
（一） 觀心論11-19
（二） 色具三千19-20
（三） 別理隨緣20-21
三、山家山外之爭的影響21-25
（一） 重建法統21-22
（二） 多樣化的發展22
（三） 天台與淨土的融合22-23
（四） 天台宗與禪宗的爭論23-25
結語25-26
註釋26-28
參考資料28-29
論文摘要（中文）29-31
論文摘要（英文）31-33
後記33 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 834 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2008.06.27 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2015.11.19 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
