 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transmetaphysical Thinking in Heidegger and Zen Buddhism |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Steffney, John
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Philosophy East and West
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.27 n.3 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 1977.07 |
|---|
| ページ | 323 - 335 |
|---|
| 出版者 | University of Hawaii Press |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| キーワード | Being; Consciousness; Dasein; Metaphysics; Ontology; Zen Buddhism; Heidegger |
|---|
| 抄録 | In Heidegger's philosophy，getting back to the ground of metaphysics--transcending metaphysics--entails a transcendence of the ordinary function of human consciousness. Zen's transcendence however--especially with regard to subject-object duality--is much more radical than Heidegger's. Even the late Heidegger，Heidegger III，presents his "Ereignis" as a third，appropriating ontological link，existing beyond being and nonbeing. But in Zen this would be classified as "relative" "Sunyata"，not "absolute" "Sunyata"，which is neither relative nor relational but paradoxical to the extent that it does not even have itself. And in view of Heidegger's concern--obsession--with dread，his "homecoming" itself is questionable. Zen would say that Heidegger's difficulty，right to the end，was that he was still thinking metaphysically，despite his effort otherwise; moreover，that his thinking was never genuinely transmetaphysical but at best quasi-metaphysical. |
|---|
| ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.2307/1398002 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 1171 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2001.01.17; 2002.03.24
|
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2019.05.17 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
