|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who Speaks for Norinaga? Kokugaku Leadership in Nineteenth-Century Japan |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
McNally, Mark
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Japanese Journal of Religious Studies
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.38 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2011 |
|---|
| ページ | 129 - 159 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture=南山宗教文化研究所 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/en/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 名古屋, 日本 [Nagoya, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| キーワード | Kokugaku; Hirata Atsutane; Motoori Norinaga; Motoori Haruniwa; Motoori Ōhira; Kido Chidate; Hattori Nakatsune; Kiyosōhansho; iemoto; dōtō |
|---|
| 抄録 | Hirata Atsutane’s prominence within the Kokugaku tradition is well known, as is his status as the successor to the great scholar, Motoori Norinaga. Atsutane’s remarkable ascendance did not happen overnight; indeed, it was at times a controversial process that unfolded over many years. Atsutane’s Kokugaku leadership was challenged by Norinaga’s sons, Haruniwa and Ōhira, as well as Kido Chidate, a bookseller and financial supporter of Norinaga in Kyoto. The work of the late sociologist Pierre Bourdieu is especially helpful in coming to grips with these sociopolitical interactions. His theory of symbolic capital gives us a way of conceptualizing what dominance meant in the context of nineteenth-century Kokugaku. However, symbolic capital has its limitations when analyzing traditional Japanese cultural institutions. Specifically, the master-disciple practices associated with the iemoto system represented a significant impediment to Atsutane’s claims of Kokugaku leadership based on his succession of Norinaga. In order to overcome this, Atsutane invoked the
discourse of the dōtō, and used key relics to substantiate his special status. |
|---|
| ISSN | 03041042 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 606 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2013.04.16 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2017.09.13 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
