|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
探究文化間際概念與哲學思考的關聯=Exploring the idea of interculturality and its relation to philosophizing |
|
|
|
著者 |
陳學毅 (著)=Chen, Hsueh-I (au.)
|
掲載誌 |
正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly
|
巻号 | n.73 |
出版年月日 | 2015.06.25 |
ページ | 11 - 40 |
出版者 | 正觀雜誌社 |
出版サイト |
http://www.tt034.org.tw/
|
出版地 | 南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 中文=Chinese |
ノート | 作者為國立臺灣師範大學副教授 |
キーワード | 文化間際=intercultural; 跨文化=transcultural; 多元文化=multicultural; 文化-culture; 哲學=philosophy |
抄録 | 全球化的趨勢,讓不少學術研究,無論是人文或是自然科學學門,都試圖從「跨越文化」(transcultural)或是「文化間際」(intercultural)等角度探究或連接各式各樣的問題。但是實踐連接文化的概念的之前或同時,我們是否需要考慮一些文化之間的先前條件愈結構性問題?何謂「跨越」文化、如何「連接」在不同哲學文化所形成的概念,等問題,將是此文章的探索主題。 本文將從德語系探究文化的哲學家,例如Heinz Kimmerle、Ram Adhar Mall、Elmar Holenstein 與 Franz Martin Wimmer 等學者的論述,整理他們對西方哲學「歐洲中心主義」批判,並爬梳殖民主義對哲學歷史發展的影響。同時從「文化間際」觀點,反思哲學整體「方向」(Orientierung)的問題,探討文化間際哲學如何系統化地,通過「有與無歸屬地」(orthafte Ortlosigkeit)特色與「多重對話」(Polylog)等文化間際概念,討論、重構哲學的問題、融合哲學文化與哲學歷史傳統的差異。
Due to globalization, many academic disciplines in both humanities and natural science are attempting to explore or connect a wide range of problems from transcultural or intercultural perspectives. In order to put the intercultural concept into practice, we need to consider questions concerning the preconditions and structures of interculturality. The main objective of this paper is to investigate the meaning of "going beyond" or " inter-connecting" philosophical concepts that are derived from different philosophical cultures. This paper will inquire into theories developed by German intercultural philosophers, such as Heinz Kimmerle, Ram Adhar Mall, Elmar Holenstein and Franz Martin Wimmer, illuminate their criticism of the Eurocentric character of Western philosophy and discuss the influence of colonialism with regards to the historical development of philosophy. This paper will also reflect the orientation of philosophy from an intercultural perspective and explore how intercultural philosophy could systematically, with the help of concepts like 'orthafte Ortlosigkeit' and 'polylogues,' discuss and reconstruct general philosophical question while simultaneously integrating the differences between philosophical cultures and traditions. |
目次 | 一、文化間際之問題出發點 13 二、歐洲中心主義哲學體系的批判 16 三、文化「間際」概念為哲學思考的方針 21 四、從文化「間際」重構「哲學」概念 26 第五章 結論 34 參考文獻 36 |
ISSN | 16099575 (P) |
ヒット数 | 593 |
作成日 | 2015.08.10 |
更新日期 | 2017.09.07 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|