|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yinming Logic and Dialogue in the Contact Zone |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Assandri, Friederike
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Journal of Chinese Philosophy
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.41 n.3-4 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2014.09-12 |
|---|
| ページ | 344 - 360 |
|---|
| 出版者 | International Society for Chinese Philosophy |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://iscp-online1.org/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | FRIEDERIKE ASSANDRI, Research Associate, Center for East Asian Studies (ZO), University of Heidelberg. Specialties: early medieval Daoism, Buddhism, inter-religious debates in medieval China. E-mail: friederike_assandri@yahoo.com |
|---|
| 抄録 | This article presents a case of the application of Buddhist yinming logic in a public debate between Buddhists and Daoists at the court of Emperor Tang Gaozong, as recorded by Daoxuan in his Ji Gujin Fo Dao Lunheng. The application was successful in the sense that the Buddhist vanquished his Daoist opponent. Yet, yinming logic was not used in other debates against Daoists, not even by Buddhists trained in this particular logic. Why? Looking for answers to this question, the article argues for the importance of common analytical ground in inter-religious, and by extension intercultural debate. |
|---|
| 目次 | I.Encounters of Cultures and Traditions in the Present and in the Past 344
II.Debates between Buddhists and Daoists 345
III.The Subject of Debate: Dao in the Contact Zone 346
IV.Analytical Method: Yinming Logic and the Question of Dialogue 348
V.Conclusion 355 |
|---|
| ISSN | 03018121 (P); 15406253 (E) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 410 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2016.05.11 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2019.08.27 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
