|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
如來藏三經一論的自性清淨說: 以他空中觀二諦觀點詮解=The Pure Self-nature of the Tathagata’s Three Sūtras and One Śāstra —Interpretation from “Other-emptiness” of Two Truths on the Middle Way |
|
|
|
著者 |
廖雅嫻 (著)=Liao, Ya-Hsien (au.)
|
掲載誌 |
正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly
|
巻号 | n.108 |
出版年月日 | 2024.03.25 |
ページ | 51 - 111 |
出版者 | 正觀雜誌社 |
出版サイト |
http://www.tt034.org.tw/
|
出版地 | 南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 中文=Chinese |
キーワード | 《如來藏經》=The Tathāgatagarbha Sutra; 《不增不減經》=The Sutra of Neither Increase nor Decrease; 《勝鬘經》=The Śrīmālā Sutra; 《寶性論》=The Ratnagotravibhaga; 如來藏=Tathāgatagarbha; 自性清淨=self-nature purity; 他空中觀=Other-emptiness (Shentong) |
抄録 | 《如來藏經》、《不增不減經》、《勝鬘經》、《寶性論》 是為如來藏思想的三經一論,本文藉由藏傳佛教覺囊派他空中 觀二諦觀點詮解,試圖對自性清淨說有更深入的理解。首先, 探源自性清淨說,無論是有垢真如、無垢真如,都與煩惱客塵 不相應,自性清淨是勝義諦。再者,分析眾生受染、道諦的修 持皆為世俗諦,不影響空如來藏、不空如來藏作為自性清淨的 本質。《寶性論》提出了清淨的不同層次,由凡夫等不同的階 位,了知客塵煩惱無自性,生死輪迴並非實有,從這個角度正 視自性清淨與煩惱客塵的關係。基於「染淨依持」之說,從「有 垢真如」轉至「無垢真如」,辨析如來藏的「轉依」,與唯識 的「真如轉依」不同,如來藏思想的自性清淨說開展的是「真 如不變」的轉依之理。
“The Tathāgatagarbha Sutra,” “The Sutra of Neither Increase nor Decrease ,” “ The Śrīmālā Sutra ,” and “The Ratnagotravibhaga” are the three sutras and one commentary for the Tathāgatagarbha tradition. This article attempts to give a deeper understanding of the theory of self-nature purity through the interpretation of Other-emptiness (Shentong) in the view of the Two Truths according to the Middle Way (also The Madhyamaka) in the Tibetan Buddhist Jonangpa school. First, in the theory of self-nature purity, which is the view of the ultimate truth, neither the defiled Buddha-nature nor the pure Buddha-nature corresponds to afflictions. Furthermore, the analysis of the defilement of sentient beings and the practice of the path to the cessation of suffering is the view of the conventional truth. It does not affect the emptiness and the non-emptiness of Tathāgatagarbha as the essence of self-nature purity. “The Ratnagotravibhaga” proposes different levels of purity in accordance with different ranks, such as ordinary people, to knowing that the afflictions have no self-nature, and that samsara (the cycle of life and death) is not real. From this perspective, we should face up to the relationship between self-nature purity and afflictions. Based on the theory of pure and impure interconnected arising, transforming from the defiled Buddha-nature to the pure Buddha-nature, this paper differentiates the “Fundamental Transformation” (Āśraya-parāvaṛtti) of the Tathāgatagarbha from the “Suchness Transformation” of the Yogacara school. The theory of the self-nature purity of Tathāgatagarbha develops the principle of “Unchanging Suchness.” |
目次 | 壹、前言 貳、他空中觀二諦觀點 參、自性清淨與離垢清淨的殊義 肆、自性清淨與客塵煩惱 伍、結論 |
ISSN | 16099575 (P) |
ヒット数 | 190 |
作成日 | 2024.06.13 |
更新日期 | 2024.06.13 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|