The thesis aims at comparative study of political philosophy in Confucius' view and in Theravada Buddhism's view. The contents are divided into three main points : (1) the political philosophy of Confucius, (2) the political philosophy of Theravada Buddhism, and (3) a comparative study of the both views.
As the result of study, it is found that : (1) According to Confucius, politics means rectification. The political problems, for Confucius, are all the results of not practicing the duties of people, both the governors and citizen. To make politics right is to rectify the wrong names, implying that the governors should play the role as the moral model for the people.
(2) According to Theravada Buddhism, politics is considered as a tool to produce justice. The governors are those who accepted by people to use their power in the name of people. So the governors should be aware of the importance to be the moral model for the people.
(3) Comparing the both views, Confucius and Theravada viewed politics as natural and social evolution. To live together with many people, it is necessary to have the governor who manages and takes care for welfare of society. Due to the difference of power, intelligence, wisdom and capacity of people in society, they have to be managed with regard to their significance.
Confucius was beside the moral teacher. His another role was politician. As politician, he played his role independently. Regarding to Theravada Buddhism, the Buddha was as a religious master. His method was acted through his religious teaching. However, both Confucius and Theravada Philosophy have the same purpose, i.e. well-being of people. The difference is, Confucius emphasizing only worldly well-being, while Theraveda Philosophy emphasizing both worldly well-being and transcendental.
