 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pure Mind, Pure Land: A Brief Study of Modern Chinese Pure Land Thought and Movements |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
Wei, Tao (著)
|
|---|
| 出版日期 | 2007.01 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 87 |
|---|
| 出版者 | McGill University |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
https://www.mcgill.ca/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Montreal, Canada [蒙特婁, 加拿大] |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 學位類別 | 碩士 |
|---|
| 校院名稱 | McGill University |
|---|
| 系所名稱 | Religious Studies |
|---|
| 指導教授 | Dr. Victor Sogen Hori |
|---|
| 摘要 | The present study aims to examine the modern Chinese Pure Land thought and movements, which are part of the general context of reforms that involved the whole Chinese Buddhist community starting from the beginning of the 20th century. In this study, I examine (1) the socio-political context of modern China when Chinese Buddhist communities began to re-think their traditions and reform monastic education, under the influence of socio-political chaos and Western culture; (2) Ven. Yinguang's (1861--1940) syncretism of Pure Land thought with Confucian ethical teachings, which promoted a more secular and lay movement in response to Western influence; (3) Ven. Yinshun's (1906--2005) critical Pure Land thought which went back to early Indian Buddhism to clarify some teachings which had been corrupted during the transmission of Buddhism to China; (4) modern movements influenced by their thought. According to Robert Bellah, there are two kinds of response of Asian traditional elites to modernization: neotraditionalism and reformism. Based upon my analysis of modern Chinese Pure Land thought and movements, I argue that this dichotomy is not mutually exclusive; the two categories can overlap. Yinguang and Yinshun were both neotraditionalist and reformist. |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 364 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2023.03.13 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.03.13 |
|---|
 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
