There is actually a multi-ethnic “cultural hybridity” in various regions of Taiwan, and there are also ethno-religious identity of communitarianism with different ethnic groups, and because the territory in Taiwan is not very large, the migration and contact of various communities or ethnic groups in the long historical process, especially the various policies of successive regimes, have also had a complex impact on the people's beliefs. Religious communities and dynastic realms can be seen as two related cultural systems; In other words, this paper explores how to reproduce common religious beliefs in dynastic, ethnic, and religious communities, and how to interpret the “history” of the past; In particular, dynasties, in order to rationalize their dominance and establish a common consciousness of the people, often called on the people's identity and sense of history by establishing an authoritative tradition. Looking back at Taiwan's previous research, the interaction between Fujian-Cantonese immigrants and the pingpu indigenous peoples of Taiwan is more neglected, on the other hand, there is less attention to the governance of successive regimes, as well as the construction of temples and the holding of festivals that advocate cooperation between the government and the people, as a norm and governance to win the hearts and minds of the people and beliefs and customs, and to cross-regional and cross-ancestral origins, especially in cross-ethnic studies. Therefore, the successive regimes of Taiwan and the interaction of different ethnic groups are also the topics discussed in this paper for the construction and influence of folk customs and religious beliefs, as well as related ritual activities. There are three parts of this treatise, the first of which is the Guanyin belief in Chinese Buddhism, which mainly presents the classical basis of the Guanyin Dharma and the female “incarnation”, as well as the filial piety and Buddhism practice of the Miaoshan legend. The second part deals with imperial monarchy and Mazu beliefs, as well as gender culture and ethical indoctrination, while the third part deals with the establishment of "cross-ethnic" religious symbols, which through rituals, the relocation of union villages, and Pilgrimage becomes an alliance of pan-Han Chinese and prevents indigenous peoples and leads to the transfer of ethnic power. These three parts may seem to lack linear connections, but the complex historical process of imperial rule and multi-ethnic Taiwan is an important link between popular life and beliefs. The conclusion of the paper is to put forward a comparative study of three major levels, the first is to compare the basic differences between Buddhism and folk beliefs, for the different natures of Chinese Buddhism in its classical teachings and practice methods, Guanyin pilgrimage activities, and the Mazu belief and ritual activities; the second is to target the historical context of the Mazu incense ceremony in Taiwan, the social and cultural significance contained in it, which is also different from the pract
