A STATUE OF THE GUPTA PERIOD
BY E. A. VORETZSCH
Eastern Art
vol 1:2, 1928.10, p. 107
p. 107
In 1914 I was studying ancient Buddhist art in
Slam under the kind patronage of the Royal Siamese
government.(l) In Bangkok-on-Salarei, a
resting-station at Wat Prakeo, my attention was
attracted by a Buddhist statue that fascinated me by
its incomparable beauty and which, on account of the
softness of its handling had to be attributed not to
Siamese, but to Indian workmanship. Its expression
bore the greatest resemblance to a seated Buddha in
Sarnath of the Gupta period, of which Vincent A.
Smith in his History of Fine Art in India and Ceylon
(p. 120), after speaking of the Western influence on
Indian art, says, "this statuary presents nothing
distinctly Roman or Hellenic, unless it be the
refined restraint above mentioned, which is not quite
Indian. Can it be that in the Gupta age some
forgotten sculptor of genius succeeded in absorbing
the Greek spirit into Indian forms? Who can tell?" In
reality, however, the statue was far more beautiful
than the one described by Smith. It was full of life
and motion, traits which are, indeed, not foreign to
Greek and post-Alexandrian art, yet occur also in the
deepest, purely Indian representations, as, for
example, in the representation of Siva. in the
Deogarh Temple or the incomparable Kapila in
Anuradhapura. The statue, of which I made a
pencil-sketch at the time, has since then repeatedly
stimulated my imagination. In 1925, during a
rest-period in my work, I sent the sketch to the best
art connoisseur in Siam, H. R. H. Prince Damrong,
with the request to look up the statue and to have
photographs made and sent to me, no easy task,
considering the countless quantities of statues
decorating the temples in Bangkok. Prince Damrong
kindly carried out my request; he immediately found
the statue and had photographs forwarded to me, which
I here publish for the first time. Prince Damrong
informed me that he himself had seen the statue in
Sarnath during a trip abroad, that he had acquired
it, and in 1892 presented it to the king of Siam.
The statue represents Buddha, advancing from a
huge halo, with the left knee slightly raised for a
forward step. just as though this were the prototype
of the representation of Buddha pacing through the
universe, so popular in the later Gupta age. i The
right: hand is opened with a welcoming gesture (the
left arm unfortunately has been broken off) and the
slender body shows the typical Indian hip-modelling.
The head is slightly inclined toward the front, and
the mouth with its hardly perceptible smile, breathes
serenity and human kindliness. On the two shoulders
the garment is indicated. A simple neck-band
encircles shoulders and chest; there is a classical
delicacy in the treatment of the abdomen, which
swells slightly from under the tightly drawn apron;
there is an unsurpassable calm in the parallelism of
motion produced by the tilted head and raised left
arm.
I do not hesitate to assert that this statue can
be justly compared with the greatest achievemrnts of
Indian art, namely those of the Kapila in
Anuradhapura, the Siva and Parvati in Elephanta, or
the Siva Nataraja of Polonnaruva.
Through this opportunity, which unfortunately has
been long postponed because of official work, I take
special pleasure in expressing my thanks to Prince
Damrong, for placing this masterpiece once more
within reach of' those interested in the great period
of Indian art.
___________________
1 Ueber alt-buddhistische Kunst in Slam,
Ostasiatische Zeitschrift, Jahrgang V/VI, Heft 1/4
and 1/2.
2 A. Salmony, Sculpture in Slam, p. 54.