|
|
![](en/images/title/Title_FulltextSearch.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
Apologetic Strategies in Late Imperial Chinese Pure Land Buddhism |
|
|
|
Author |
Jones, Charles B.
|
Source |
Journal of Chinese Religions=中國宗教研究集刊
|
Volume | v.29 |
Date | 2001 |
Pages | 69 - 90 |
Publisher | Johns Hopkins University Press |
Publisher Url |
https://www.press.jhu.edu/
|
Location | Baltimore, MD, US [巴爾的摩, 馬里蘭州, 美國] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 英文=English |
Keyword | pure land Buddhism; Chinese Buddhism |
Abstract | Western scholarship on Chinese Pure Land history, when it has treated relationships between Pure Land and other schools of Chinese Buddhism, has tended to stress the resolution of conflicts and the emergence of schemas such as "the dual practice of Chan and Pure Land". Such studies easily leave the impression that the resilutions of conflicts that Pure Land authors or other Chinsese Buddhist figures offered in their own time had lasting or pervasive effects in settling the dispute for all times and places, an impression not so far contraditicted within scholarly literature in North America or Europe. |
ISSN | 0737769X (P); 20508999 (E) |
Hits | 746 |
Created date | 2005.05.13 |
Modified date | 2020.04.16 |
![](en/images/logo/bg-btn-edit.png)
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|