|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Deconstructionist Interpretation of Nagarjuna's Catuskoti=龍樹四句的解構詮釋 |
|
|
|
| Author |
釋如源=Shi, Ru-yuan
|
|---|
| Source |
正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly
|
|---|
| Volume | n.54 |
|---|
| Date | 2010.09.25 |
|---|
| Pages | 155 - 180 |
|---|
| Publisher | 正觀雜誌社 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.tt034.org.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | PhD candidate, the Dep. of Religious Studies, the University of Calgary, Canada=加拿大卡加利大學博士候選人；Sessional instructor, Mount Royal University, Canada=加拿大皇家山大學約聘講師 |
|---|
| Keyword | Catuskoti=四句; Structuralism=結構主義; Deconstructionism=解構主義; Dialectic=辯証法 |
|---|
| Abstract | Catuskoti is one of the popular topics that many scholars like to investigate in regard to Nagarjuna’s philosophy. Some Buddhist scholar such as T. R.V. Murti, Richard H. Robinson and Kajiyama Yuichi have adopted Hegel’s Dialectic towards the interpretation of Nagarjuna’s Catuskoti after discovering that it is impossible to apply the formulas of ordinary logic to explain the theory. Under the paradigm of the dialectic, the four propositions of Catuskoti are
interpreted hierarchically and hence, can be considered as a structural interpretation. However, their dialectic constructional interpretation is very controversial. On the basis of Zhon Lun Shi (中論釋), Prajbapradipa and Prasannapada as primary sources, this paper adopts Derrida’s deconstructionist concept to provide another possible interpretation to Catuskoti. That is, according to those commentaries of Mulamadhyamakakarika, the propositions of
Catuskoti are to interpret the same object from four different perspectives, and thus, they are equally true. Therefore, Catuskoti neither contradicts the ordinary logic nor has a hierarchical structure, and owing to the absence of hierarchies, the constructional interpretation of Catuskoti is deconstructed.
龍樹的「四句解讀」一直是其哲學中很受歡迎的研究主題。有關四句的解讀，由於其內在邏輯的矛盾性，早期一些知名的學者諸如Murti、Robinson 和梶山雄一等人，為消弭此矛盾性，皆採取黑格爾辯証法的角度加以詮釋。在辯証邏輯的規範之下，四句被階層性地解讀，而此種階層性的解讀可被當成一種建構式的詮釋。然而，這種階層性的建構詮釋法其實是相當具爭議性的。本論文以《中論釋》、《般若燈論》及《明句論》等《中論》之注釋書為基本資料，並取用Derrida 的解構思考作為研究方法，嘗試提供一個不同於建構主義的解讀。根據上列三種《中論》注釋書的詮釋，龍樹「四句」實際上是從四種不同的角度來描述同一件事物，因此四句本身並無內在邏輯的矛盾性，也無高低權實的區別，而皆具同一的真實性。在此階層結構的破除之後，此四句的建構解讀法自然而然被解構了。 |
|---|
| ISSN | 16099575 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 1424 |
|---|
| Created date | 2006.10.20 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.09.06 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
