|
|
![](en/images/title/Title_FulltextSearch.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
The Conventional Status of Reflexive Awareness: What's at Stake in a Tibetan Debate? |
|
|
|
Author |
Garfield, Jay L.
|
Source |
Philosophy East and West
|
Volume | v.56 n.2 |
Date | 2006.04 |
Pages | 201 - 228 |
Publisher | University of Hawaii Press |
Publisher Url |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
Location | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 英文=English |
Keyword | 仁波切=Rinpoche; 正念=覺知=Mindfulness=Awareness; 宗喀巴=Tsong Khapa; awareness; consciousness; humanities; philosophy |
Abstract | rJe Tsong khapa argues that consciousness is not intrinsically reflexive even conventionally, and reads Candrakīrti and ?āntideva as endorsing this view. 'Ju Mipham Rinpoche (1846-1912) criticizes Tsong khapa's argument and his reading of Candrakīrti, arguing that while ultimately consciousness is not intrinsically reflexive, conventionally it is. This article defends Tsong khapa's philosophy of mind and his hermeneutical strategy and shows that this debate is important both philosophically and doxographically. |
ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
DOI | 10.1353/pew.2006.0020 |
Hits | 2483 |
Created date | 2007.08.30 |
Modified date | 2019.05.17 |
![](en/images/logo/bg-btn-edit.png)
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|