|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
The nature of the Ma¯dhyamika trick |
|
|
|
Author |
Huntington, C. W., Jr.
|
Source |
Journal of Indian Philosophy
|
Volume | v.35 n.2 |
Date | 2007.04 |
Pages | 103 - 131 |
Publisher | Springer |
Publisher Url |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
Location | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 英文=English |
Note | Authors and affiliations:Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Hartwick College, Oneonta, USA |
Abstract | This paper evaluates several recent efforts to interpret the work of Nāgārjuna through the lens of modern symbolic logic. An attempt is made to uncover the premises that justify the use of symbolic logic for this purpose. This is accomplished through a discussion of (1) the historical origins of those premises in the Indian and Tibetan traditions, and (2) how such assumptions prejudice our understanding of Nāgā rjuna’s insistence that he has no “proposition” (pratijñā). Finally, the paper sets forth an alternative interpretation that takes into account the literary dimensions of Nāgārjuna’s writing. |
Table of contents | I 103 II 111 III 116 IV 126
|
ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
Hits | 288 |
Created date | 2007.11.26 |
Modified date | 2019.08.21 |

|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|