|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On what do we rely when we rely on reasoning? |
|
|
|
| Author |
Nance, Richard
|
|---|
| Source |
Journal of Indian Philosophy
|
|---|
| Volume | v.35 n.2 |
|---|
| Date | 2007.04 |
|---|
| Pages | 149 - 167 |
|---|
| Publisher | Springer |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
|---|
| Location | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Abstract | In Buddhist texts authored in Indian and Tibetan traditions of
scholasticism, one is regularly directed to check one’s understanding against
‘‘scripture and reasoning.’’ To date, however, comparatively little attention has
been given to the usage of the latter term of this pair (Skt. yukti, Tib. rigs pa) in
Indian Buddhist texts. Building on the work of Scherrer-Schaub, Kapstein and
others, this paper discusses divergent glosses of the term yukti as found in
Indian Buddhist texts. By highlighting continuities and discontinuities in these
accounts, the paper aims to stimulate reflection on the ways in which our
assumptions regarding reasoning—and, by extension, what is to count as
‘‘Buddhist philosophy’’—are represented in, and perhaps contested by,
thematizations offered within the tradition. |
|---|
| ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
|---|
| Hits | 141 |
|---|
| Created date | 2007.11.26 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.07.30 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
