Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
弁長・良忠における『往生要集』理解について =Interpretations of the Ojoyoshu by Bencho and Ryochu
Author 那須一雄 (著)=Nasu, Kazuo (au.)
Source 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
Volumev.55 n.2 (總號=n.111)
Date2007.03
Pages691 - 697
Publisher日本印度学仏教学会
Publisher Url http://www.jaibs.jp/
Location東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language日文=Japanese
Keyword弁長; 良忠; 法然; 往生要集; 法然門下
AbstractIn the Ōjōyōshū,Genshin places the contemplative nembutsu in a superior position to the vocal recetation,He considers the contempolative practice,represented by the absolute and phenomenal nembutsu,to be the highest form of nembutsu practice Genshin does not consider the recitation to be the most significant Pure Land practice. On the other hand, Hōnen establishes his teaching as the sole practice of nembutsu reciation following Shan-tao's idea of "establishing faith through practice" in his Guanjing sitie shu, Sanshanyi. Based on his understanding of nembutsu, Hōnen reinterprets Genshin's Ōjōyōshū. Hōnen does not consider the other types of nembutsu discussed in the text, such as the contemplative nembutsu, three kinds of ritual protocols,and the visualization of the Buddha, to be very important practices. Benchō and Ryōchū the second and third patriarchs of the Jōdo Shū cotinue Hōnen’s position and interpret the Ōjōyōshū through their master's understanding of nembutsu. However, they also emphasize the significance of the other types of nembutsu―the contemplative nembutsu, the three kinds of ritual protocols, and the visualization of the buddha ―which had been ignored by Hōnen. Further, they recognize the possibility of birth in Pure Land through practices other than recitation. While developing their doctrinal positions, these two masters must have read the Ōjōyōshū rather literally, distinct from Hōnen's position. In order to justify their interpretations, however, they apply the concept of "contingently right acts"discussed in Hōnen's Senchakushū.
Table of contents一、問題の所在 691
二、法然における『要集』理解 691
三、弁長における『要集』理解 692
四、良忠における『要集』理解 693
五、結論 695
〔註〕 696
ISSN00194344 (P); 18840051 (E)
Hits673
Created date2007.12.17
Modified date2025.06.30



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
152340

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse