![](en/images/title/Title_FulltextSearch.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
從康德與佛教知識論看學校課程內涵=Epistemological Disagreement between Kant and Buddhism and Its Implication on Curriculum |
|
|
|
Author |
陳利銘 (著)=Chen, Li-ming (au.)
|
Source |
佛學與科學=Buddhism and Science
|
Volume | v.8 n.2 |
Date | 2007.07.01 |
Pages | 70 - 80 |
Publisher | 圓覺文教基金會 |
Publisher Url |
http://www.obf.org.tw
|
Location | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 中文=Chinese |
Note | 陳利銘,彰化師範大學教育研就所博士生 |
Keyword | 康德知識論=Kant’s epistemology; 佛教知識論=epistemology of Buddhism; 課程=curriculum |
Abstract | 本文之目的,在透過康德與佛教知識論之論析,試圖建構出東西知識論對話的可能性。康德在「純粹理性批判」指出,知識要在感性直觀與悟性範疇的基礎上經由自我統覺的綜合統一而來,且知識只存於現象界,本體界是不可知的。佛家則認為要經由現量及比量的認識作用,並確認與經驗相符,才能成為真正的知識,但在唯識論及緣起法的基礎上,認為並沒有本質上的實體存在,沒有實在的、普遍的知識存在。二者對知識的觀點可謂大相逕庭。在比較康德及佛教知識論中的異同點後,最後則試圖以其對課程所可能產生的影響作為結論。 [Abstract] This paper purports to analyze the differences between the epistemology of Kant and Buddhiem, and to discuss the implications of these manifested differences on curriculum. It is an effort to construct interconnections between western and eastern philosophies. The theories of Kant’s epistemology are introduced and compared with epistemological theories of Buddhism, such that the similarities and differences between Kant and Buddhism are exposed. Then, the implications of the differences of the differences between the two on curriculum are briefly discussed in the concluding section.
|
Table of contents | 一.前言 二.康德知識論的內涵 1.先驗感性論之探究 2.先驗分析論之探究 3.先驗辯證論之探究 三.佛教知識論之內涵 1.緣起法則之探究 2.唯視思想之探究 3.陳那一法稱知識論之探究 四.康德與佛教知識論的比較分析 1.共通處 (1)均認為知識的來源是經驗與推理之綜合 (2)均認為認識作用不能愉悅經驗的界線,但感覺經驗有其限制 (3)均強調認識作用的主體性 2.相異處 (1)知識本質的相異 (2)知識起源的相異 (3)論述知識目的相異 五.討論與結論 參考文獻 |
ISSN | 16072952 (P) |
Hits | 1925 |
Created date | 2008.04.22 |
Modified date | 2017.07.21 |
![](en/images/logo/bg-btn-edit.png)
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|