Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
禪的詭論和邏輯
Author 成中英 (著)=Cheng, Chung-ying (au.)
Source 中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
Volumen.3
Date1990.04
Pages185 - 208
Publisher中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies
Publisher Url http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
Location新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language中文=Chinese; 英文=English
Keyword禪宗=Zen Buddhism=Zazen Buddhism; 公案; 邏輯; 語意學; 存有論
Abstract禪宗公案,究竟是邏輯,還是詭辯? 吾人至少可以提出
三點禪之詭辯論的事實. 難怪強調概念清晰,邏輯一致,暨
語意上求其有意義的現代哲學家,會把「禪」神祕化; 也難
怪以某種理論來詮釋宗教經驗暨宗教語言的現代宗教哲學家
,認為禪宗經驗及語言最令人匪夷所思.

為要消解這些疑惑,本文特別論究公案之邏輯,及其
在語意學上之意義; 並澄清其方法論暨存有論之基礎. 本文
主想討論有關公案所引生的疑惑,暨禪之詭辯性兩個基本
問題:如何以邏輯合理方式來衍生出有意義層面而作為彰顯
或達到終於真理的工具? 如何合理的解釋這些疑惑暨詭論?
邏輯上又如何解釋?

吾人對這些問題的答案,主是根據對禪之疑惑暨詭
論之深度分析. 我們指出禪宗悟者把公案之表面語意與其深
一層存有論的指涉二者之關係予以打破,使表面意義的語言
失去了本身存有論中的指涉者; 因此,同一禪語言能形成有
新的表面語意的語言形式,而其本體之指涉仍不變,亦即其
本體指涉者沒特定的指涉對象.

前者形成了所謂「本體無承諾原則」; 後者則精成「意
義呈現 (重組) 原則」,本文許多論點不外乎是此二原則的
詮解,相信將能使吾人對禪之語言及其疑惑暨詭辯論有進一
步合理的瞭解.

When a ch'an Buddhist speaks of kung-an ("open
case"),he is using a form of paradoxical language
in which laws of logic are contradicted and common-
rules of understanding are defied. This form of
language is usually a dialogue or a problem-posing-
and-disposing between a ch'an master and his
disciple seeking wu (enlightenment). How is this
form of language understood? Can we avoid calling it
"illogical" and "unintelligble"? Can we give it a
logical and rational explanation and justification
and thus bring out its own logicality? Furthermore,
can we enlighten the attainment of wu in light of
logic and reason? In this paper I made the effort
and attempt to explain and justify the use of
kung-an as a matter of logical and referential
transformation. The following two principles are
specifically formulated and proposed for this
explanatory and justificatory purpose:the principle
of ontological non-commitment and the principle of
contextual reconstitution.
ISSN10177132 (P)
Hits1283
Created date1998.07.22
Modified date2017.06.15



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
252097

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse