 |
|
|
|
|
| Author |
于君方
|
|---|
| Source |
中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.8 |
|---|
| Date | 1995.07 |
|---|
| Pages | 97 - 136 |
|---|
| Publisher | 中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
|
|---|
| Location | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
|---|
| Keyword | 觀音菩薩=Avalokiteshvara; 陀羅尼; 經典目錄=經錄=Catalogue of Sutras; 疑經=suspicious scripture=Buddhist Apocrypha; 偽經=spurious scripture; 譯經=The Translation of Sutra |
|---|
| Abstract | 佛教傳入中國以後，除經典的有系統的漢譯以外，
大量的「疑偽」經典也從六朝以後不斷地出現. 其中不少
是以宣揚觀音信仰為中心，與建立及傳布觀音在中國的信
仰上，成一個重要的媒介. 本文首先討論幾個有代表性
的經錄對「真經」及「偽經」的看法，從而指出並無客觀
及一定的標準，接著討論近年來中外學者對疑偽經的一些
見解，說明何以多數學者認為用「中國撰造經典」比「疑
經」或「偽經」更為恰當. 其次討論幾個重要的觀音「偽
經」，將它們的思想及修持儀軌與正統經咒相比較，從而
探討「疑偽經」的保守性與創新性. 最後用明朝撰造的兩
部歌頌觀音的「偽經」作為代表，來分析觀音「偽經」成
立與皇室推崇的政治因素，並從而試論「偽經」中反映的
中國文化色彩.
Since the Six Dynasties, about the 4th-6th
centuries A.D.，following the introduction and
domestication of Buddhism in China, there have
been a great number of so-called "apocryphal
scriptures" Produced in China, many of them
centered around the belief in Kuan-yin.They served
as a very important medium in the establishment
and spread of Kuan-yin cult in China.This article
first examines the views on "genuine scriptures"
versas "apocryphal scriptures" as found in several
representative catalogues of scriptures. From such
a general survey of views, it is possible to see
that there does not seem to exist a body of
objective and verifiable standard to make such a
distinction between the two. We will then review
the ideas of recent scholars concerning the
"apocryphal scriptures" and discuss why other
expressions such as "scriptures composed in China"
or "Chinese indigenous scriptures" were suggested
by them as more suitable to refer to these
sutras. We next discuss several important
indigenous scriptures promoting Kuan-yin faith and
compare their thoughts and methods of practice
with those of "orthodox scriptures" and thereby
argue that the former show both conservatism and
innovation. Finally，we look at the process of how
two Ming empresses created their own apocryphal
sutras and venture some hypotheses about the
relationship between royal patronage and the
appearances of such scriptures. |
|---|
| ISSN | 10177132 (P) |
|---|
| Dynasty | 清代 |
|---|
| Regions | 中國 |
|---|
| Hits | 2618 |
|---|
| Created date | 1998.07.22
|
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.06.16 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
