|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Buddha Nature: True Self as Action |
|
|
|
Author |
King, Sallie B. (著)
|
Source |
Religious Studies
|
Volume | v.20 n.2 |
Date | 1984.06 |
Pages | 255 - 267 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Publisher Url |
https://www.cambridge.org/
|
Location | Cambridge, UK [劍橋, 英國] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 英文=English |
Keyword | Anatman; 禪宗=Zen Buddhism=Zazen Buddhism; self; atman; Fo Hsin Lun; Buddha Nature; Tathagatagarbha |
Abstract | Buddhism, and especially early Buddhism, is known for the anātman (no self) teaching. By any account, this teaching is central to both doctrine and practice from the beginning. Zen Buddhism (Chinese Ch'an), in contrast, is known for its teaching that the single most important thing in life is to discover the ‘true self’. Is there a real, or only an apparent, conflict between these two versions of Buddhism? Certainly there is at the least a radical change in the linguistic formulation of the teaching. Examining the two teachings on the linguistic level, we note that the use of the term ‘true’ in the phrase ‘true self’ may indicate that we have here a conscious reformation of the place of the term ‘self’ in the tradition, or perhaps that the use of this phrase in Zen is the product of such a conscious formulation. Thus we may expect, upon investigation, to find an evolution from one teaching to the other, rather than a true doctrinal disparity. The apparent, or linguistic, conflict between the two, however, remains; hence we must also expect to find a doctrinal formulation at some point in this evolution in which the apparent conflict is consciously apprehended and resolved. |
Table of contents | I. THE BUDDHA NATURE CONCEPT 257 II. BUDDHA NATURE AND ANATMAN 258 III. BUDDHA NATURE AND ZEN 264 IV. CONCLUSION 266
|
ISSN | 00344125 (P); 1469901X (E) |
Hits | 327 |
Created date | 1998.04.28
|
Modified date | 2023.03.15 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|