|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
文法家ミーマーンサカ=Mīmāṁsaka as a Grammarian |
|
|
|
| Author |
小川英世 (著)=Ogawa, Hideyo (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
哲学=テツガク=The journal of Hiroshima Philosophical Society
|
|---|
| Volume | (總號=n.38) |
|---|
| Date | 1986.10.25 |
|---|
| Pages | 67 - 83 |
|---|
| Publisher | 広島哲学会 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.hiroshimatetsugaku.com/
|
|---|
| Location | 廣島, 日本 [Hiroshima, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Note | 100; This entry is copyrighted by INBUDS, used with permission.
|
|---|
| Keyword | Tantravarttika; Slokavarttika; Kumarila; インド; インド文法學 |
|---|
| Abstract | The Mīmāṁsakas lay down a principle termed ekaprasaratābhaṅga to prevent the uddeśya-vidheya relation from being posited for a compound (samāsa). Constituent meanings of a compound, say A and B, must play the same role of either uddeśya or vidheya. It is impossible that A is uddeśya and at the same time B is vidheya.
Relying on the Mahāhāṣya ad P2.1.1, Kumārila explains ekaprasaratā from a view-point of sāmarthya (semantic connection) which is formulated by Patañjali: sāpekṣam asamarthaṁ bhavati. Kumārila considers ekaprasaratābhaṅga to be associated with sāmarthyābaāva (absence of semantic connection).
Later Mīmāṁsakas do distinguish between two levels, viz. one in which the meaning-cognition is obtained from a compound and the other in which a compound's uddeśya-vidheya relation is established on the basis of prāptāprāptaviveka-principle. For them, ekaprasaratābhaṅga does not necessarily imply sāmarthyābaāva. |
|---|
| ISSN | 04952200 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 271 |
|---|
| Created date | 1998.04.28; 2002.10.08
|
|---|
| Modified date | 2020.08.17 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
