|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rethinking Western Feminist Critiques on Buddhism=重思西方女性主義對佛教的評論 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Cheng, Wei-yi (著)=鄭維儀 (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
The Fourth Chung Hwa International Conference on Buddhism: The Role of Buddhism in the 21st Century=第四屆中華國際佛學會議 -- 「佛教與廿一世紀」
|
|---|
| Date | 2002.01.19 |
|---|
| Pages | 13 |
|---|
| Publisher | 中華佛學研究所=The Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies |
|---|
| Location | 臺北縣, 臺灣 [Taipei hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 會議論文=Proceeding Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | The Fourth Chung Hwa International Conference on Buddhism：The Role of Buddhism in the 21st Century, Organized by Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies, DDMBA; January 18-20, 2002, Auditorium of Acemic Activity Center, Acemia Sinica. 第四屆中華國際佛學會議 -- 「佛教與廿一世紀」, 法鼓山中華佛學研究所主辦, 2002年1月18-20日, 中央研究院學術活動中心. |
|---|
| Keyword | Buddhism in 21st Century=佛教與廿一世紀; Feminism=女性主義; Postcolonial=後殖民主義; Western Buddhism=西方佛教 |
|---|
| Abstract | In this essay，I look at Western feminist critiques on Buddhism from Postcolonial perspective. I argue that Western feminists often neglect the complexity of Asian Buddhism，and the tendency to normalize Western values is also a form of oppression. In fact，some Western feminist critiques on Buddhism may have more to do with the concept of 'Western Buddhism' than with the genuine concern for Asian Buddhist women.
在這篇文章裡，我是以後殖民主義的角度來看待西方女性主義對佛教的評論. 我須爭論的是，西方女性主義家通常會忽略亞洲佛教的複雜性，而在這個議題上，他們企圖將西方的價值觀標準化亦是另一種侵略性壓迫.
事實上，某些西方女性主義對佛教的評論大都只跟 "西方佛教" 這個概念有關，真正涉及到亞洲佛教女性的卻很少. |
|---|
| Table of contents | Introduction
From Postcolonialism to Feminism
Hybrid Native
Values vs. Norms
Western Buddhism
Conclusion |
|---|
| Hits | 838 |
|---|
| Created date | 2002.02.15
|
|---|
| Modified date | 2016.08.18 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
