 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zen og kunsten at spejlvende orientalisme |
|
|
|
| Author |
Borup, J.
|
|---|
| Source |
Science of Religion
|
|---|
| Volume | v.32 n.3 |
|---|
| Date | 1998 |
|---|
| Pages | 3 - 20 |
|---|
| Publisher | Roots and Branches |
|---|
| Location | Cambridge, UK [劍橋, 英國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | original source Journal：Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift |
|---|
| Keyword | 禪宗=Zen Buddhism=Zazen Buddhism; 日本佛教=Japanese Buddhism |
|---|
| Abstract | The article intends to put into perspective the critique of Orientalism raised by Edward Said with a case story (beyond Said's Orient) exemplifying how the Orientalist discourse has been inverted，serving as a means of religious and cultural identification. Focusing on the religious environment around the Japanese interpreter and popularizer of Zen Buddhism，D. T. Suzuki，it is argued that a genealogical network of interrelated persons and a reciprocal exchange of ideas and representations, placed within certain historical contexts, made it possible for him to systematically invert those Orientalist ideas, turning them into new East-West dichotomies. It is argued that neither Suzuki-zen nor Orientalism nor inverted Orientalism must be ignored but recognized and contextualized in order to reconstruct Buddhist studies as a natural and important field within the comparative study of religion. (journal's summary) |
|---|
| ISSN | 01658794 |
|---|
| Hits | 236 |
|---|
| Created date | 2000.11
|
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.08.13 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
