 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
高攀龍的佛教觀——兼及高攀龍思想的儒學本色=Gao Panlong’s Viewpoint of Buddhism and the Confucian Essence of His Thought |
|
|
|
| Author |
李承貴
|
|---|
| Source |
江南大學學報 (人文社會科學版)=Journal of Jiangnan University (Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)
|
|---|
| Volume | n.4 |
|---|
| Date | 2004 |
|---|
| Pages | 40 - 44 |
|---|
| Publisher | 江南大學 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.jiangnan.edu.cn/
|
|---|
| Location | 江蘇, 中國 [Chiangsu, China] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 出處:中國期刊網－文史哲輯專欄目錄
|
|---|
| Keyword | 高攀龍; 佛教觀; 儒學本色 |
|---|
| Abstract | 高攀龍對於佛教的觀點有：佛教所言“性”所言“善”都不具有“天理”之內容；無論是從在中國歷史上出現的時限，還是從討論問題的內容看，佛教與儒學都不是一家；佛教有蔑視禮教、沒有情義、自私等缺點。本文的評論是：唯一的儒學坐標、片面的否定態度及對儒學基本主張的持守，凸顯出其思想的儒學特色；而對佛教的認知與評價不乏誤讀之處
Gao Panlong’s viewpoint of Buddhism is that the words “nature” and “good” which Buddhism claims are different from Confucian “principle”. Either judging by the time they appeared or by the content they talked, we can draw a conclusion that Buddhism and Confucianiam are not of the same school. Buddhism has some disadvantages. It disdains ceremony, has no emotion and is also selfish. This article concludes that Gao persisted in Confucianism, obeyed Confucian doctrine and excluded Buddhism unilaterally on the one hand, which demonstrates the essence of his thought. On the other hand, there are many mistakes in Gao Panlong’s cognition and evaluation about Buddhism. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 佛教義理之失 40
佛儒不是一家 42
佛教之禍害 42
儒學本色 43
|
|---|
| ISSN | 16716973 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 344 |
|---|
| Created date | 2005.02.25
|
|---|
| Modified date | 2020.03.12 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
