|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
印順導師之部派佛教思想論(I) -- 三世有與現在有=Ven. Yinshun's Theory of Sectarian Buddhist Thought (I): Existence in the Three Periods and Existence in the Present |
|
|
|
| Author |
釋惠敏 (著)=Shih, Hui-min (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.17 |
|---|
| Date | 2004.07 |
|---|
| Pages | 19 - 44 |
|---|
| Publisher | 中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
|
|---|
| Location | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | 作者為國立臺北藝術大學教授 |
|---|
| Keyword | 印順導師=Ven. Yinshun; 部派佛教=sectarian Buddhism; 三世有=existence in the three periods; 現在有existence in the present; 實體=essence; 作用=function; 曾有=previous existence; 當有=future existence; 薰習=perfuming; 種子=seeds |
|---|
| Abstract | 印順導師以「探源明變，抉擇洗鍊」的方法，對於部派佛教思想探究，主要有1940-44年（35-39歲）《唯識學探源》、1942-43年（37-38歲）《印度之佛教》、1944-50年（39-45歲）《性空學探源》等作品。以本文的考察為例，可看出印老的思想體系在此期間已經大致成熟，論證的基調也大慨確定了。之後，從1967-68年（62-63歲）起，寫作出版印度佛教各階段思想主題的專書，到1987-88年（82-83歲）時，以《印度佛教思想史》作為「對印度佛教思想發展研究的結論」。
印老對於「佛法」的分化為不同部派的大綱是：在《印佛教》（1943）時，以「二部、三系、四派」名稱，《唯識》（1944）也沿用；但在《有部》（1968）則改稱為「二部、三部、四部」，此用語於《初期大乘》（1981）也沿用，進而將部派分化的本末先後，以不同意義的四階段，推算西元年代為（1）B.C. 300大眾、上座二部（戒律的問題）、（2）B.C. 270思想的分化（以教義為部派的名稱）、（3）B.C. 230分出部派以地區、寺院為名。（4）B.C. 100說轉部也是依教義（十八部全部成立）。印老也依據般若在北方的普及與流行的西元50年「下品般若」集出年代，將約西元前300～西元50年期間稱為「佛法的部派時代」。
印老參考《成實論》之「十論」，對於各部派的眾多異義，在《印思史》（1988）則以「三世有與現在有」、「一念見諦與次第見諦」、「補特伽羅與一心」作為綱領。針對「三世有與現在有」的部派異義，印老是從「諸行無常」的生滅無常、剎那生滅現象中，「無我論」佛教如何於「法體」建立因緣而生果的關係關係來解釋：說一切有系以「法體不變而作用變異」的意義而主張「法體恆有，而說性非常」。相對於說一切有系之「體、用義」，印老分析「現在有」的學派時，則說明大眾系以「理、事義」，主張「事唯現在」，是以「曾有、當有」建立「過去、未來」，而經部則以「種、現」義建立「酬前、引後」而說明「過去、未來」，並且也將「曾有、當有」與「種、現」二義連接，成為「過去曾有（熏），未來當有（種）」的發展關係。
此外，印老將「三世實有」的主張比喻為「如珠珠之相累」與人群在「甲屋、走廊、乙屋」的行進；將「現在實有」的主張比喻為「如明珠之旋轉反側，自空而下，似相續而實唯一珠」。最後，印老將「現在有」的部派思想，與大乘唯識家之「現在幻有」（過去未來是假）相對應；將「三世有」的部派思想，與大乘中觀家之「三世如幻」思想相對應。
Ven. Yinshun uses the method of “exploring origins to illustrate change, and selection as a discipline” in his writings on sectarian Buddhist thought. Main works include: Weishi xue tanyuan (A study of the origins of consciousness-only thought), written 1940-44, age 35-39; Yindu zhi Fojiao (Indian Buddhism), written 1942-43, age 37-38; Xingkong xue tanyuan (A study of the origins of ?ūnyatā thought), written 1944-50, age 39-45. As will become evident in this paper, Ven. Yinshun's thought had already matured by this period, and his method of argumentation had been established. Following this period, beginning in 1967-68 (at age 62-63), he wrote and published monographs on each of the main stages of development of Indian Buddhist thought. In 1987-88 (age 82-83), he completed Yindu Fojiao sixiang shi (History of Indian Buddhist thought) as “a conclusion to my research on the development of Indian Buddhist thought.” The main outline of Ven. Yinshun's classification of sectarian divisions is as follows: In his Yindu zhi Fojiao of 1943, he uses the terms “two sects, three divisions, and four schools,” also used in his Weishi xue tanyuan of 1944. In his Shuoyiqieyoubu zhi lunshu yu lunshi zhi yanjiu (A study of Sarvāstivādin treatises and treatise-masters) of 1968, this becomes “two sects, three schools, and four schools,” which is also used in his Chuqi Dasheng Fojiao zhi qiyuan yu kaizhan (The origins and development of early Mahāyāna Buddhism) of 1981. Then, using different criteria for classification, he re-periodizes sectarian Buddhism: 1. 300 BCE: two sects: Mahāsaṃghika and Sthaviravāda (Vinaya issues); 2. 270 BCE: divisions on the basis of doctrine (sects were named for their doctrinal positions); 3. 230 BCE: sects are named after regions and monasteries; 4. 100 BCE: Saṃkrāntivādins are also named on the basis of doctrine (all eighteen sects have been established). Ven. Yinshun, in accordance with his dating the second period (of four) of prajñāpāramitā thought to 50 CE, a time when prajñā was widespread and popular in northern India, demarcates the period from 300 BCE to 50 CE as “the sectarian period of Buddhism.”Ven. Yinshun refers to the Satyasiddhi ?āstra's “Ten Disputes” regarding to the varying theories of sectarian Buddhism, and the main structure of his Yindu Fojiao sixiang shi (A history of Indian Buddhist thought) makes use of the following rubrics: “existence in the three periods and existence in the present,” “seeing the truth in one moment and seeing the truth in stages,” and “pudgala and one mind.” With respect to the sectarian differences regarding “existence in the three periods and existence in the present,” Ven. Yinshun, starting from the “impermanence of saṃkāras” (the phenomena of impermanence in terms of arising and ceasing, and arising and ceasing in terms of momentariness) and the doctrine of non-self, explains how Buddhism establishes the relationship of causes and |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、前言 21
二、相關的著作年譜 22
三、部派分化大綱：二部、三部、四部 24
（一）二部、三系、四派（1943-）
（二）二部、三部、四部（1968-）
（三）部派分化的本末先後的四階段（1981-）
四、部派的異義 29
五、三世有與現在有 30
（一）三世有（說一切有部、犢子部、說轉部；化地部末計、案達羅四部）
（二）現在有
（三）曾有、當有與薰習、種子
（四）「三世有、現在有」學說的比喻
（五）三說總評
六、結論 40
|
|---|
| ISSN | 10177132 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 2011 |
|---|
| Created date | 2010.07.23 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.06.20 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
