法眼文益悟道歷程及其史傳文獻意義考=A Critical Examination of the Biographical Accounts of Fayan Wenyi's Enlightenment Experience

黃繹勳 (著)=Huang, Yi-hsun (au.)

Author

黃繹勳 (著)=Huang, Yi-hsun (au.)

Source

臺大佛學研究=Taiwan Journal of Buddhist Studies

Volume

n.24

Date

2012.12

Pages

61 - 92

Publisher

國立臺灣大學佛學研究中心=The Center for Buddhist Studies, National Taiwan University

Publisher Url

http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~ntucbs/

Location

臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan]

Content type

期刊論文=Journal Article

Language

中文=Chinese; 英文=English

Note

作者為佛光大學佛教學系副教授

Keyword

法眼文益=Fayan Wenyi; 長慶慧稜=Changqing Huiling; 羅漢桂琛=Louhan Guichen; 悟道歷程=Enlightenmen Experience; 燈錄=Records of the Transmission of the Lamp

Abstract

法眼文益（885-958）的生平紀載，由於《宋高僧傳》（988）首記文益先參長慶惠稜（854-932），再參羅漢桂琛（867-928），因此，文益的傳記中有關其求道與開悟的歷程，是後期各史傳和燈錄中描述最分歧的部分。本文中，筆者將文益的史傳資料依其成立年代順序，比較《宋高僧傳》、《景德傳燈錄》（1004）、《禪林僧寶傳》（1119）和《聯燈會要》（1183）的內容，以分析每一部史傳之歧異及其意義。本文之重點不在於判斷何種文獻資料是正確的，因為這些文獻的內容資料也已經是歷史的一部分。這些文獻資料的價值在於，如果我們能夠藉由進一步探索這些文獻內容，便能思考如何詮釋它們所代表的意義。筆者認為以如此角度與方法，才能擺脫判斷史傳文獻真偽的思維標準，並且見到不同時期之禪宗史傳學家筆下，所希望呈現的法眼文益禪師之樣貌。

Chen master Fayan Wenyi's法眼文益（885-958）biography is first found in the Song gaoseng zhuan宋高僧傳（Biographies of Eminent Monks Compiled in the Song；988）. In Fayan Wenyi’s life, the accounts of his enlightenment experience vary the most among his later biographical sources. The controversy starts with the Song gaoseng zhuan’s description that Wenyi first studied with Chan master Changqing Huiling長廣慧稜（854-932）and then continued to study with Luohan Guichen羅漢桂琛（867-928）. Later biographers have to decide which lineage Wenyi belongs to, provide justification, and further elaborate upon Wenyi’s enlightenment experience.
The author compares Wenyi’s biographies from different periods of time, namely the Song gaoseng zhuan, the Jingde chuandeng lu景德傳燈錄（Jingde Record of the Transmission of the Lamp；1004）, the Chanlin sengbao zhuan禪林僧寶傳（Biographies of Samgha Treasure of the Chan School；1124）and the Liandeng huiyao聯燈會要（A collection of Essential Material from the Chan’s Successive Records；1183）in order to see the development and discrepancies exhibited in each of Wenyi’s biographers. By examining Wenyi’s biographies are more accurate than the others. Rather, it is more important to understand the historical meanings behind the discrepancies of these biographical materials.

Table of contents

一、前言 62
二、《宋高僧傳》之內容 63
三、《景德傳燈錄》之內容 68
四、《禪林僧寶傳》之內容 73
五、《聯燈會要》之內容 79
六、總結 81

ISSN

10271112 (P)

	Search Criteria	Browse