|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Deceptive Simplicity of Nāgārjuna's Arguments Against Motion: Another Look at Mūlamadhyamakakārikā Chapter 2 |
|
|
|
Author |
Arnold, Dan (著)
|
Source |
Journal of Indian Philosophy
|
Volume | v.40 n.5 |
Date | 2012.10 |
Pages | 553 - 591 |
Publisher | Springer |
Publisher Url |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
Location | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 英文=English |
Note | Author Affiliations: University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA |
Keyword | Nāgārjuna; Madhyamaka; Metaphysics |
Abstract | This article—which includes a complete translation of Mūlamadhyamakakārikā chapter 2 together with Candrakīrti's commentary thereon—argues that notwithstanding the many different and often arcane interpretations that have been offered of Nāgārjuna's arguments against motion, there is really just one straightforward kind of argument on offer in this vexed chapter. It is further argued that this basic argument can be understood as a philosophically interesting one if it is kept in mind that the argument essentially has to do with whether a personal level of description will admit of an exhaustively impersonal explanation. |
Table of contents | The Enduring Appeal of Nāgārjuna’s Arguments on Motion, and One Take on the Basic Project of Madhyamaka 553 “An Investigation of Motion”: An Annotated Translation of MMK 2.1–6 563 Appendix: MMK 2.7–25 578
|
ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
Hits | 268 |
Created date | 2013.10.11 |
Modified date | 2023.10.18 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|