|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
從《長阿含經》及《長部》經群檢視四禪是否外道之說=Was four jhānas non-Buddhist's initiative? Examination from the Dīgha Nikāya and Dīrgha Agama group texts |
|
|
|
| Author |
越建東 (著)=Yit, Kin-tung (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly
|
|---|
| Volume | n.66 |
|---|
| Date | 2013.09.25 |
|---|
| Pages | 5 - 38 |
|---|
| Publisher | 正觀雜誌社 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.tt034.org.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者為國立中山大學通識教育中心暨哲學所 |
|---|
| Keyword | 《長阿含經》=Dīgha Nikāya; 《長部》=Dīrgha Agama; 經禪=group texts; 四禪=four jhānas; 外道之說=non-Buddhist's initiative |
|---|
| Abstract | 四禪以及其修行方法是否為佛教所獨創的修行理論，多年來引起學術界不少熱烈的討論。本文嘗試以漢譯《長阿含經》及巴利《長部》經群作為一個整體，去分析和論述四禪是偏向來自於佛說抑或是共外道之說。根據對相關經典經文一一仔細的比對和解讀，提出更有利的證據。最後，根據新的解讀方法，提出本人的主張和看法。
This paper tries to take the whole collection of the Dīgha Nikāya and Dīrgha Agama as group texts by using new methodology to be a special stance, to examine the issue of four jhanas.The attempt is to study each relevant text, through thorough analysis, and argue that whether the four jhānas are non-Buddhist's initiative and practiced by them, or lean to support the view that they are more likely to be practiced distinctively by Buddhists, and hence innovation of the Buddha.This conclusion is based on comprehensive reading of existing evidences, and substantial evaluation on controversial passages. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、前言 6
二、經群的概念 9
三、結論 35
參考文獻 36
|
|---|
| ISSN | 16099575 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 952 |
|---|
| Created date | 2013.10.16 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.09.07 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
