|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
寫經書法述論 -- 以敦煌吐魯番寫本為中心=A Study of The Calligraphy on Buddhist Scriptures: Focus upon The Transcripts of Turpan, Dunhuang |
|
|
|
| Author |
毛秋瑾 (著)=Mao, Qiu-jin (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
故宮博物院院刊=Palace Museum Journal
|
|---|
| Volume | n.3 |
|---|
| Date | 2011 |
|---|
| Pages | 97 - 112 + 161 |
|---|
| Publisher | 紫禁城出版社 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.culturefc.cn/index/product.jhtml?act=index
|
|---|
| Location | 北京, 中國 [Beijing, China] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 敦煌=Dunhuang; 吐魯番=Turpan; 佛教=Buddhism; 寫經=copying Buddhist scriptures; 書法=calligraphy |
|---|
| Abstract | 本文以敦煌吐魯番地區發現的佛經寫本為例,探討了兩方面的問題: 一是佛經的翻譯與抄寫情況,說明寫經遵循一定的程式,寫經人態度虔誠並關注書寫的優劣;二是佛教寫經所用書體的不同,說明唐代抄寫佛經原典時均以正書書寫,而抄錄同時代人的注疏、釋論時較多使用行草書,並分析了形成這一現象的各種因素。
This paper takes the Buddhist transcripts found in Turpan, Dunhuang for instance to approach the subject from two angles. As far as the interpretation and transcription of the Buddhist sutras was concerned, there was already the formal procedure that was strictly obeyed,and the persons in charge of the mission should be very religious and good at handwriting.On the other hand, the calligraphy styles varied in copying the different scriptures, i.e. in the Tang dynasty the original Buddhist sutras were to be copied in Chinese regular script, while the transcription of the notes and commentaries, interpretations and comments by the people of the same time usually in running and cursive script. This paper also makes an analysis of the reasons for what above. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、佛經的翻譯與抄寫 97
二、佛教寫經所用書體 102
三、結論 112
|
|---|
| ISSN | 04527402 (P); 04527402 (E) |
|---|
| Hits | 240 |
|---|
| Created date | 2013.10.17 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.09.20 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
