Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
(Book Review) Buddhisms and Deconstructions: New Frameworks for Continental Philosophy
Author Jiang, Tao
Source Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Volumev.75 n.1
Date2007.03
Pages191 - 194
PublisherOxford University Press
Publisher Url http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/
LocationOxford, UK [牛津, 英國]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article; 書評=Book Review
Language英文=English
NoteBuddhisms and Deconstructions: New Frameworks for Continental Philosophy. By Jin Y. Park. . Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2006. 312 pages. $27.95.
AbstractEdited volumes can easily suffer from inconsistency of entries and barely related contributions. Buddhisms and Deconstructions, edited by Jin Y. Park, skillfully avoids such potential traps. It brings together a set of very interesting pieces by Buddhist scholars in various traditions on the one side and Robert Magliola on the other, who is a known authority on continental philosophy, especially deconstructionism, and a pioneer in the engagement of Buddhism, Christianity as well as various strands of postmodern thought. Indeed, a unique feature of the volume is this very engagement between the two sides. Many of the essays are directly related to Magliola's own works while others deal more generally with deconstructionism, especially that of Jacques Derrida. Therefore my focus will be on the three pieces Magliola comments on or responds to in detail so as to highlight the unique aspect of this volume.

In his essay, “Deconstructive and Foundationalist Tendencies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism,” Roger Jackson seeks to frame the engagement between Buddhism and deconstructionism by situating various strands of Buddhist philosophy on the continuum between the two poles of foundationalism and deconstructionism. Accordingly, he argues that within the Indo-Tibetan Buddhist tradition Nāgārjuna represents the deconstructive end, Dharmakīrti the foundationalist end, and other figures and schools somewhere in between. Furthermore, Jackson tries to make the case that even Nāgārjuna exhibits foundationalist tendencies and Dharmakīrti deconstructionist sentiments. In making his argument this way, Jackson cautions against any attempt to pigeonhole Buddhism too neatly into the deconstructive end. Instead he advocates that some balance needs to be maintained between the two poles in order to have a better understanding of Buddhism.

In his response, Magliola challenges Jackson's interpretations of the Buddhist traditions and, especially, the deconstructionist movement. According to Magliola, Jackson is …
ISSN00027189 (P); 14774585 (E)
Hits313
Created date2014.12.04
Modified date2020.01.10



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
539551

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse