|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Significance of Xiong Shili's Interpretation of Dignāga's Ālambana-parīkṢā (Investigation of the Object) |
|
|
|
| Author |
Makeham, John
|
|---|
| Source |
Journal of Chinese Philosophy
|
|---|
| Volume | v.40 Issue Supplement S1 |
|---|
| Date | 2013.12 |
|---|
| Pages | 205 - 225 |
|---|
| Publisher | International Society for Chinese Philosophy |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://iscp-online1.org/
|
|---|
| Location | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | Author Information:
The Australian National University, Australia |
|---|
| Abstract | This essay is an exercise in intellectual archaeology in which I seek to show that already in Xiong Shili's first account of Yogācāra, Weishixue Gailun (A General Account of Yogācāra Learning) (1923), we are able to find the first indications of a critical attitude to Yogācāra that would grow in intensity over the following two decades. These critiques served the rhetorical purpose of bolstering the authority of Xuanzang (seventh century). Before long, however, Xiong even rejected that authority. |
|---|
| ISSN | 03018121 (P); 15406253 (E) |
|---|
| Hits | 687 |
|---|
| Created date | 2015.03.13 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.08.29 |
|---|
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
