|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Yogacara Doctrine of Buddha-Nature: Paramartha vs. the Fa-hsiang School |
|
|
|
Author |
Chan, Wing-cheuk
|
Source |
Canadian Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
Volume | v.3 |
Date | 2007 |
Pages | 35 - 58 |
Publisher | Nalanda College of Buddhist Studies |
Publisher Url |
http://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cjbs
|
Location | Toronto, Canada [多倫多, 加拿大] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 英文=English |
Abstract | There were two main streams in Yogacara Buddhism. On the one hand, there was the Old School of Sthiramati and Paramartha. On the other hand, there was the New School of Dharmapala and Hsuan Tsang. Due to the work of Yoshifumi Ueda and Gadjin Nagao in Japan, the distinction between Paramartha and the Fahsiang School has been to a large extent clarified. The difference between their doctrines on Buddha-nature has been, however, relatively neglected by modern scholarship. This paper aims to clarify the distinction between Paramartha and the Fa-hsiang’s doctrines of Buddha-nature. Following Ueda, this paper will also differentiate Paramartha’s doctrine of Buddha-nature from the doctrine of the tathagatagarbha presented in the Awakening of Faith. Especially, we will see that Buddha-nature in the Awakening of Faith and the Fa-hsiang School are committed to a version of essentialism. Finally, it will discern some interesting parallels between Paramartha’s doctrine and the perfect teachings of T’ien T’ai Buddhism. |
Table of contents | I 37 II 41 III 45 IV 51 Notes 53
|
ISSN | 1710825X (P); 17108268 (E) |
Hits | 330 |
Created date | 2015.05.05 |
Modified date | 2017.07.19 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|