|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is Buddhism Eco-friendly? Examining the Case of Tzu Chi in Taiwan Using Niklas Luhmann's Systems Theory=佛教是生態友善的嗎？以盧曼系統理論檢視慈濟 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Cheng, Wei-yi (著)=鄭維儀 (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
法印學報=Journal of Dharma Seals
|
|---|
| Volume | n.4 |
|---|
| Date | 2014.10 |
|---|
| Pages | 21 - 41 |
|---|
| Publisher | 財團法人弘誓文教基金會 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.hongshi.org.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 桃園縣, 臺灣 [Taoyuean hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | 1.作者簡介：玄奘大學宗教學系助理教授
2.本文係科技部整合型研究計畫「台灣本土宗教思想倫理對生態、環境的論述、影響與前瞻──台灣環境倫理與動物倫理之佛教論述、影響與前瞻」之第二期報告。該項計畫編號為 NSC 101-2632-H-364-001-MY3。本計畫執行期間自民國101年08月01日起至104年07月31日止。 |
|---|
| Keyword | Buddhist ecology=佛教生態學; Niklas Luhmann=盧曼; Tzu Chi=慈濟; eco-religious communication=宗教生態溝通 |
|---|
| Abstract | Many Buddhists or scholars promote Buddhism as holistically ecological. This view is popular and unquestioned for a long time so much so that there are terms such as 'eco-Buddhism' or 'green Buddhism'. However, since the late twentieth century, this view has been challenged. Some scholars question whether Buddhism offer holistic and genuine discourse on ecology or it is a product of Buddhist apologists. This paper will use the case study of a Buddhist organization in Taiwan- Tzu Chi, to reflect on this debate. It will examine Tzu Chi's environmental protection works through the standpoint of Niklas Luhmann's systems theory. By so doing, I hope to offer a new perspective on the relationship between Buddhism and ecological discourse.
許多佛教徒或者學者將佛教視為對生態友善的宗教，能為生態提供全方位的論述，甚至有了「生態佛教」等名詞。然而在二十世紀末以來，有些學者提出不同意見，認為生態佛教不過是佛教護教者的產物，佛教本身並不具有生態保護的傳統。本文將採用盧曼的系統理論觀點，檢視台灣佛教團體慈濟的環保工作，以期能對佛教與生態之間的關係提供新的論點。
|
|---|
| Table of contents | Buddhism and Ecology 23
Niklas Luhmann 26
Tzu Chi 27
Eco-Religious Communication 29
To Purify One’s Mind 32
Becoming Bodhisattva 35
|
|---|
| ISSN | 22241299 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 572 |
|---|
| Created date | 2015.12.03 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2020.06.09 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
