|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
一念無明法性心 : 其存有暨意義結構之解析="The Heart of One Single Mind Embracing Ignorance and Dharma-nature Simultaneously": An Analysis on Its Structures of Being and Meaning |
|
|
|
| Author |
陳平坤 (著)=Chen, Ping-kun (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
新世紀宗教研究=New Century Religious Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | v.5 n.3 |
|---|
| Date | 2007.03 |
|---|
| Pages | 67 - 106 |
|---|
| Publisher | 世界宗教博物館發展基金會附設出版社 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.mwr.org.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 臺北縣, 臺灣 [Taipei hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者為臺灣大學哲學博士候選人 |
|---|
| Keyword | 心=Heart; 一念=One Single Mind; 無明; 法性=Dharma-nature; 存有=Being; 意義=meaning; 天台宗=Tiantai School; 一念三千=One mind containing three thousand worlds |
|---|
| Abstract | 針對天台圓教的核心觀念：「一念無明法性心」，本文通過掌握「無明」作為認識論乃至具有價值論意涵的概念，以及「法性」基本上是個反映存有論問題的概念，而希望由此深入闡論智顗大師圍繞「一念無明法性心」所建立的看法，譬如「無明即法性，法性即無明」、「心是一切法，一切法是心」、乃至「介爾有心，即具三千」等等的確切含義。並且，依據這樣的論釋結果，本文也嘗試回應學界質詢智顗所說，到底是「二元論」、還是「一元論」的問題。
至於本文的主要看法乃是：「無明」與「法性」的分別，從智慧實踐的動態角度來看，實是為了表示「一念心」的兩重結構；而它們之間，不存在誰生起誰，乃至彼此是否同時或異時存在的問題。因為，「一念無明法性心」，在本質上不是一個宇宙論的概念；更嚴格來說，也不是一個存有論的概念，而是用以揭示具有解脫指向的價值實踐活動，乃是一種不能割離事物之「存有」以發現其「意義」的心智運作。所以，根據這種義理所建立的「一念三千」之說，即使顯露某種「二元（創生）論」的意味，但那其實只是一種「假性」的二元論述。
Considering "the heart of one single mind embracing ignorance and dharma-nature simultaneously", which is the core concept of the Perfection Doctrine of Tiantai School, this paper discusses that "ignorance" is a concept of epistemology and axiology while "dharma nature" is a concept of ontology. In this paper, the author tries to explain the exact meaning of Master Zhi-Yi's theories based on "the heart of one single mind embracing ignorance and dharma-nature simultaneously", namely "ignorance is dharma nature while dharma nature is ignorance", "all dharmas are mind while mind is all dharmas", and "three thousand worlds exist where mind exists". Based on the explanation, this paper responses to the academic community's inquiry about whether Master Zhi-Yi's theories fall into dualism or monism.
This paper presents the following main ideas: Reviewed from the perspective of dynamic intellectual practice, the differentiation between "ignorance" and "dharma nature" reveals the dualistic structure of "the heart of one single mind". Regarding "ignorance" and "dharma nature", there is no need to question about "which onegenerates the other" or "whether they exist simultaneously or asynchronously". In nature, ”the heart of one single mind embracing ignorance and dharma-nature simultaneously” is neither a cosmological concept nor an ontological concept. It reveals that extrication-oriented value practice is a sort of intellectual activity, in which a thing's meaning cannot be found without recognition of its being. Hence, the theory of "one mind containing three thousand worlds" based on this teaching is in deed a false dualistic conclusion, even though it presents a dualism (origination) meaning to a certain extent. |
|---|
| ISSN | 16843738 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 464 |
|---|
| Created date | 2015.12.10 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2020.01.13 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
