|
|
|
The bibliographic record is provided by 李玉珉老師.
|
|
|
|
關於莫高窟第217窟南壁壁畫的思考=Studies on the wall-painting on the south wall of Cave 217 Mogao Grottoes |
|
|
|
| Author |
施萍婷 (著)
;
范泉 (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
敦煌研究=Dunhuang Research
|
|---|
| Volume | n.2 (總號=n.126) |
|---|
| Date | 2011.04 |
|---|
| Pages | 12 - 20 |
|---|
| Publisher | 敦煌研究編輯部 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.dha.ac.cn/
|
|---|
| Location | 蘭州, 中國 [Lanzhou, China] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 施萍婷為敦煌研究院研究員，范泉為敦煌研究院科研處館員。 |
|---|
| Keyword | 法華經變=The Illustrations to Lotus Sutra; 佛頂尊勝陀羅尼經變=The Illustrations to Usnisa Vijaya Dharani Sutra; 變相; 莫高窟=Mogao Grottoes; 第217窟=Cave 217 |
|---|
| Abstract | 莫高窟第217窟南壁的壁畫,以前考證為法華經變,近年日本學者下野玲子以《佛頂尊勝陀羅尼經》來比對這幅壁畫,推翻了以前的法華經變的結論。但下野的考證仍存在很多問題,本文在檢討了諸多問題之后,認為這鋪壁畫既不是法華經變,也非佛頂尊勝陀羅尼經變,壁畫的主題仍須進一步探討。
The wall-painting on the south wall of Cave 217 Mogao Grottoes was previously identified as the illustrations to the Lotus Sutra.In recent years,Shimono Akiko,a Japanese scholar has denied this identification by comparing it with the Usnisa Vijaya Dharani.However,Shimono Akiko’s researches are also doubtful in many aspects.After discussing various problems concerned,this article considers that the painting is neither the illustrations to the Lotus Sutra nor the illustrations to Usnisa Vijaya Dharani.The theme of this painting has to wait for further studies. |
|---|
| ISSN | 10004106 (P) |
|---|
| Categories | 石窟; 佛教圖像; 繪畫 |
|---|
| Dynasty | 唐代 |
|---|
| Regions | 甘肅(敦煌莫高窟) |
|---|
| Hits | 404 |
|---|
| Created date | 2016.05.12 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.03.11 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
