|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
敦煌疑偽經四種殘卷綴合研究=Restoration and Study on the Fragments of Four Apocryphal Scriptures Among Dunhuang Documents |
|
|
|
| Author |
張小艷 (著)=Zhang, Xiao-yan (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
敦煌研究=Dunhuang Research
|
|---|
| Volume | n.1 (總號=n.155) |
|---|
| Date | 2016.02 |
|---|
| Pages | 68 - 77 |
|---|
| Publisher | 敦煌研究編輯部 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.dha.ac.cn/
|
|---|
| Location | 蘭州, 中國 [Lanzhou, China] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者單位：復旦大學出土文獻與古文字研究中心 |
|---|
| Keyword | 無量大慈教經=Wuliang Dacijiao Jing; 要行舍身經=Yaoxing Shesheng Jing; 贊僧功德經=Zanseng Gongdejing; 佛母經=Fomu Jing; 殘卷綴合=restoration of fragments; apocryphal scriptures |
|---|
| Abstract | 敦煌文獻中保存的一百多種疑偽經,絕大多數都不載于清以前的藏經,具有極高的研究價值,但其中不少都是殘卷(片),給整理研究工作帶來了嚴重的影響。本文通過內容接續、殘字拼合、行款相同、字跡書風相近等角度的比較分析,將《無量大慈教經》《要行舍身經》《贊僧功德經》《佛母經》等4種疑偽經中的26號殘卷(片)綴合為12組(4+4+2+2)。通過綴合,這些原本分裂的殘卷得以團聚一處;而借助于綴接后的寫本顯示的較為完整的信息,我們又可對其形制、內容與性質作出更客觀、可靠的判斷。
More than one hundred kinds of apocryphal scriptures kept in Dunhuang documents are of high research value, since the vast majority have not been recorded in Buddhist canons published before the Qing dynasty. Most of them are fragments, however, which severely impedes research work. Based on comparative analysis of the incomplete characters, context continuation, formats, and calligraphic styles, twenty-six fragments of four apocryphal scriptures, namely Wuliang Dacijiao Jing, Yaoxing Shesheng Jing, Zanseng Gongdejing and Fomu Jing,have been categorized into twelve groups. The more complete information provided by previously restored fragments allows for a more objective and reliable judgment on the form, contents, and nature of these texts. |
|---|
| ISSN | 10004106 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 243 |
|---|
| Created date | 2016.06.15 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2018.05.31 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
