|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
法國「世俗性」(laïcité)原則下 的言論自由=Freedom of Expression According to the French Tradition of “Laïcité” (“Secularism”) |
|
|
|
Author |
林碧津 (著)=Lin, Pi-chin (au.)
|
Source |
玄奘佛學研究=Hsuan Chuang Journal of Buddhism Studies
|
Volume | n.24 |
Date | 2015.09.01 |
Pages | 49 - 83 |
Publisher | 玄奘大學 |
Publisher Url |
http://ird.hcu.edu.tw/front/bin/home.phtml
|
Location | 新竹市, 臺灣 [Hsinchu shih, Taiwan] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 中文=Chinese |
Note | 作者單位:法國南錫第二大學(Université de Nancy II)政治學博士 宗教容忍與言論自由專輯 |
Keyword | 世俗性=Laïcité; 言論自由=freedom of expression; 宗教信仰自由=freedom of religion; 嘲諷漫畫=satirical cartoons; 法國共和精神=French spirit of republican tradition |
Abstract | 言論自由的爭論,自始常和政治與宗教牽扯。2015年初法國「查理事件」引發的爭議-言論自由與宗教信仰孰輕孰重,若從法國歷史文化脈絡中理解,與「世俗性」(Laïcité)原則脫不了關係,亦即與宗教信仰在法國社會中被賦予之社會功能和所代表的意義息息相關。本文即針對何謂「世俗性」原則;「世俗性」是否等同於「言論自由」;既受到法國世俗傳統的影響,「言論自由」在法律保障下,如何看待宗教表述;另外,言論自由保障下的「嘲諷權」與「傷害言論」,該如何區隔;以及法律是解決或深化仇恨,且實踐上是否會引發倫理道德爭議等各面向,試從法律觀點逐一檢視。
Freedom of expression is considered the most significant characteristics of a liberal society, while it's often in conflict with religion and politics. In early 2015, a huge controversy was raised in the wake of the tragic attack on French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo: where to draw the line concerning freedom of expression and religion? In France, the answer can only be found through reference to French laïcité (“secularism”). This paper will try to clarify the meaning and function of the principle and how it is applied to freedom of expression and religion issues. Inevitably, it will distinguish between the legal parody as a form of free speech and hate speech, to know whether the law could resolve disputes or deepen prejudice. |
Table of contents | 摘要 49 Abstract 50 一、前言:圖像爭議中的宗教定位 51 二、「世俗性」原則:從良心自由、信仰平等到解放宗教束縛 56 三、言論自由與宗教信仰的法律關係 62 四、嘲諷及褻瀆之權 68 五、結語:共和價值 vs.社群主義 73 參考書目 75 一、專書 75 二、期刊論文/專論 76 三、法規及判例 78 四、報刊專文 80 五、其他 82 |
ISSN | 18133649 (P) |
Hits | 736 |
Created date | 2016.06.16 |
Modified date | 2017.12.08 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|