|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
『金綱集』「禅見聞」における二、三の考察：作成年代と禅の分類について=On the Compilation Date and Classification of Zen Buddhism in the Zen kenbun 禅見聞 Chapter of the Kinkō-shū 金綱集 |
|
|
|
| Author |
古瀬珠水 (著)=Furuse, Tamami (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
仙石山仏教学論集=Sengokuyama journal of Buddhist studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.7 |
|---|
| Date | 2014.02.05 |
|---|
| Pages | 1 - 15 |
|---|
| Publisher | 国際仏教学大学院大学 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.icabs.ac.jp/
|
|---|
| Location | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Note | 古瀬珠水(東京外国語大学非常勤講師／鶴見大学仏教文化研究所兼任研究員／国際仏教学大学院大学修了生／博士（文学）) |
|---|
| Keyword | 禅問答; 日本仏教; 禅宗; 日蓮宗; 曹洞宗; 臨済宗; 金綱集; 見性成仏論; 正法眼蔵; 楞伽経; 日蓮遺文; 禅見聞; 三種禅; 教禅; 如来禅; 祖師禅; 十種禅 |
|---|
| Abstract | The Kinkō-shū is widely believed to be the work of Nikkō 日向 (1253-1314), one of Nichirenʼs six great disciples. A close look at the text, however, reveals a few details pointing at the necessity of revisiting the problem of its authorship and compilation date. We find, for instance, the Zen kenbun Chapter of the Kinkō-shū describes conflictual relations between the Rinzai and Sōtō schools. We know, however, that relations between the two main branches of Zen Buddhism in Japan were initially amicable and did not become marred by sectarianism until early 14th century. It is thus obvious that the Zen kenbun could not be ascribed to Nikkō himself. The chapter, at least in its extant version, must have been written or redacted later than the first decades of the 14th century by one Nikkōʼs disciples.
Another peculiar aspect of the Zen kenbun is its double classification of Zen into three as well as ten traditions, two different taxonomic patterns somehow related to each other but having different origins. The categorization into three types belongs to Nichiren, while the ten-type classification goes back to Dahui’s Analects 大慧語録. It is quite intriguing why the author of the chapter found it important to include a classification peculiar to a Chinese Chan source instead of restricting himself to the categorization adopted by the Patriarch of his own school. Further research is needed to determine whether the author made direct use of the Chinese source(s) for his second taxonomic pattern or borrowed it from a Zen text compiled in Japan. |
|---|
| Table of contents | はじめに 1
一、「禅見聞」の作成年代 2
二、「禅宗立三種十種其中」について 3
「三種の禅」 3
「十種の禅」 9
結び 10
註 11 |
|---|
| ISSN | 21853444 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 360 |
|---|
| Created date | 2016.08.31 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.05.14 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
