|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
敦煌本『提謂波利経』諸本の関係について：附「引文一覧」「『提謂波利経』本文・引文対照」=Stemmatic Relations Between the Dunhuang Manuscripts of the Tiwei Poli jing, with a List of Citations and Concordance to the Tiwei Poli jing Text and Citations |
|
|
|
| Author |
新田優 (著)=Shinden, Yu (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
仙石山仏教学論集=Sengokuyama journal of Buddhist studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.8 |
|---|
| Date | 2016.03.31 |
|---|
| Pages | 37 - 127 |
|---|
| Publisher | 国際仏教学大学院大学 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.icabs.ac.jp/
|
|---|
| Location | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Note | 新田優(国際仏教学大学院大学博士課程) |
|---|
| Abstract | The Tiwei Poli jing 提謂波利經 is an apocryphal scripture composed in China by Tanjin 曇靖 during the reign of Emperor Xiaowu 孝武帝 (453-464) of the Liu Song 劉宋 Dynasty. For a long time, the text was believed to have been lost, but the research conducted by Makita Tairyo between 1964 and 1973 led to the identification of four Dunhuang manuscript fragments: Scroll One (P. 3732) and Scroll Two (S.2051; Дx.1657; BD.3751). Makita's conclusion, however, were based on partial access to the manuscript photocopies as well as the survey of the scriptural catalogues, which explains why he did not discuss the stemmatic relations between the fragments.
Needless to say, a detailed study of the Tiwei Poli jing requires the clarification of the relations between all extant fragments. The current availability of facsimile editions as well as online acess to the manuscripts makes such a study possible. Nonetheless, all contributions published since Makita's seminal work remain content to repeat his conclusions.
My paper attempts to address this desideratum by investigating the textual witnesses themselves from all available sources, whether printed or digital. The conclusions yielded by this research shows that Дx.1657 and BD.3715 were originally part of the same manuscript as well as the fact that [Дx.1657 + BD.3715] and P.3732 come from the hand of the same copyist. This makes me assume that P. 3732 and [Дx.1657 + BD.3715] go back to the same manuscript (Scrolls One and Two). S.2051, on the other hand, is a manuscript which serves the purpose of filling in the lacunae of [Дx.1657 + BD.3715].
In addition, the citation from theTiwei Poli jing in various Buddhist scriptures offer an important source for reconstructing the lost portions the original Dunhuang manuscripts. I have therefore listed all quotations currently identified and also appended a concordance to the Tiwei Poli jing text (Dunhuang Mss and Turfan Ms I.U. No. 30 (v) ) and these citations. |
|---|
| Table of contents | はじめに 37
一、『提謂波利経』テキスト研究の現況 38
二、牧田氏による敦煌本紹介とその問題点 44
三、敦煌本『提謂波利経』の書誌学的検討 51
（一）写経形式の比較 52
1 一紙あたりの行数と一行の字数の比較 52
2 行間の比較 52
3 文字の大きさと間隔の比較 55
（二）内容によるBD.3715．Дx.1657の関係 56
（三）字体．書風の比較 58
結論 72
註 72
附「引文一覧」「『提謂波利経』本文・引文対照」75 |
|---|
| ISSN | 21853444 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 422 |
|---|
| Created date | 2016.08.23 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.05.14 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
