|
|
|
|
A Brief Criticism of the ‘Two Paths to Liberation’ Theory |
|
|
|
| Author |
Bhikkhu Anālayo (著)=無著比丘 (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | v.11 |
|---|
| Date | 2016.11 |
|---|
| Pages | 38 - 51 |
|---|
| Publisher | Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/how-get-here
|
|---|
| Location | Oxford, UK [牛津, 英國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Abstract | The present paper briefly points out problems with the assumption that the early Buddhist discourses are best read as reflecting a tension between two contrasting accounts of how liberating insight is gained, one of which involves a purely intellectual understanding of the four noble truths and the other relies on absorption attainment as productive of insight in and of itself.
|
|---|
| Table of contents | Introduction 38
The Two Paths Theory 39
The Absorptions and Insight 45
Conclusion 48 |
|---|
| ISSN | 20471076 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 444 |
|---|
| Created date | 2017.01.24 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.04.07 |
|---|
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
