|
|
|
|
|
|
近代中觀學研究=Modern Chinese Mādhyamika Study |
|
|
|
Author |
丁建華
|
Source |
哲學與文化=Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture
|
Volume | v.44 n.9 |
Date | 2017.09.01 |
Pages | 179 - 192 |
Publisher | 哲學與文化月刊雜誌社 |
Publisher Url |
http://www.umrpc.fju.edu.tw
|
Location | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 中文=Chinese |
Note | 作者為浙江工商大學馬克思主義學院哲學系講師。 |
Keyword | 近代=Modern Chinese; 中觀學=Mādhyamika Study; 有空之爭=Dispute between Mādhyamika and Vijñānavādin |
Abstract | 一般認為,中觀學由於鳩摩羅什之力而在中國開始弘傳,三論宗的消亡則意味著漢傳中觀學的間斷。近代,中觀學研究由於兩個契機而再次興起:一方面,楊文會從日本購入吉藏注疏等典籍並刻印流通,另一方面,以法尊為代表的留學藏地的漢僧,翻譯藏傳中觀學典籍,並傳播其義理。通過近代中觀學研究成果的統計可以發現,近代中觀學研究路向大致有4種:考證三論宗宗史、探究三論宗思想、中觀學文獻研究以及「空有之爭」問題的研究。由於近代唯識學的興盛,四種路向之中尤以圍繞「空有之爭」展開的研究最為當時研究者所關注。
Generally speaking it is because Kumarajiva Mādhyamika begun to spread widely, and since the Sanlun school perish disappear in China. In twenty century, Mādhyamika was back again since two causes: Yang Wenhui buy many Sanlun school's books from Japan, Fa Zun translated many Buddhism scriptures from Tibetan. In the data of Modern Chinese Mādhyamika Studies, I find there are four approach: Sanlun school's historical research; Sanlun school's thought research; Mādhyamika literature research; and the research of dispute between Mādhyamika and Vijñānavādin. And because Vijñānavādin's study flourished in the modern time, the fourth path received most attention. |
Table of contents | 壹、近代中觀學研究之興起 179 貳、近代中觀學研究之契機 180 參、近代中觀學研究之主題 185
|
ISSN | 10158383 (P); 10158383 (E) |
Hits | 658 |
Created date | 2019.01.17 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|