|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early Meanings of Dependent-Origination |
|
|
|
Author |
Shulman, Eviatar (著)
|
Source |
Journal of Indian Philosophy
|
Volume | v.36 n.2 |
Date | 2008.04 |
Pages | 297 - 317 |
Publisher | Springer |
Publisher Url |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
Location | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 英文=English |
Note | Author Affiliations: Faculty of Humanities, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem, Israel |
Keyword | Dependent-origination; pratītya-samutpāda; paṭiccasamuppāda; Early Buddhism; Conditionality; Causality |
Abstract | Dependent-origination, possibly the most fundamental Buddhist philosophical principle, is generally understood as a description of all that exists. Mental as well as physical phenomena are believed to come into being only in relation to, and conditioned by, other phenomena. This paper argues that such an understanding of pratītya-samutpāda is mistaken with regard to the earlier meanings of the concept. Rather than relating to all that exists, dependent-origination related originally only to processes of mental conditioning. It was an analysis of the self, not of reality, embedded in the Upaniṣadic search for the ātman. The teaching also possessed important ontological implications regarding the nature of the relation between consciousness and reality. These implications suggest that rather than things being conditioned by other things, they are actually conditioned by consciousness. |
Table of contents | Questions of Authenticity 300 The 12 Links 302 The Middle Path 310 Dependent-Origination Contextualized 312 Conclusions 315 |
ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
DOI | 10.1007/s10781-007-9030-8 |
Hits | 176 |
Created date | 2019.10.08 |
Modified date | 2023.10.20 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|