|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
從現代刑法學的角度論《四分律》重殺戒構成要件及其相關法理問題=The Elements and Related Jurisprudential Inquiry of the Precept against Killing in the Dharmagupta Vinaya from a Modern Criminal Law Viewpoint |
|
|
|
| Author |
陳弘學 (著)=Chen, Hung-hsueh (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
玄奘佛學研究=Hsuan Chuang Journal of Buddhism Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.29 |
|---|
| Date | 2018.03 |
|---|
| Pages | 201 - 228 |
|---|
| Publisher | 玄奘大學 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://ird.hcu.edu.tw/front/bin/home.phtml
|
|---|
| Location | 新竹市, 臺灣 [Hsinchu shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese; 塞爾維亞克羅埃西亞文=SerboCroatian |
|---|
| Note | 作者為成功大學中文系助理教授。 |
|---|
| Keyword | 戒律=vinaya; 律典=scripture; 刑法=criminal law; 四分律=Dharmagupta Vinaya; 殺人罪=precept against killing |
|---|
| Abstract | 佛教律典保存豐富僧團史料與體現深刻理性思維，具有高度學術研究價值。唯因律文艱深而內容繁多，若非通過系統性規範架構與之對比，難以襯顯背後蘊含的法理意涵。本文以《四分律》「重殺戒」（殺人戒）為考察案例，參照今日刑法學「總則」、「分則」解析模式，首先檢視「重殺戒」主、客觀構成要件，除解消因原典艱深造成的閱讀障礙，並將原文系統化與概念化，作為法理討論的基礎。其次根據前述構成要件分析結果，藉由現代刑法學開出概念與論述面向，逐一探求重殺戒之法理與法律質性問題，包括：人之始期判斷標準為何？如何處理「認知障礙、錯誤」、「故意、過失」、「既遂、未遂」？是否成立「直接正犯、間接正犯」、「教唆犯、幫助犯」等問題。希望藉此研究確立跨領域學科合作的可能，更進一步豐富當代佛學研究向度與內涵。
The Buddhist scriptures are highly valuable for academic research since they contain abundant historical data of sangha and a profound reflection on rational thinking. However, explaining the jurisprudential implications of the difficult and considerable quantities without comparing them to systematic standard is not easy. This research analyzes ＂the precept against killing＂ in the harmagupta Vinaya using the modern criminal lavw model as ＂general principles＂ and ＂kinds of offenses＂. First, the mental and behavioral elements (means rea and actus rea) are inspected and then the difficulty of reading is resolved for later jurisprudential discussion by systematizing and conceptualizing the complex original. Then, this study searches for legal and jurisprudential questions within the precept, including defining the start of a human life; handling ＂cognitive impairment versus error ＂intention versus negligence and ＂completed offense versus attempt＂ establishing ＂direct/indirect perpetrator＂ and ＂abettor/aide, etc. The purpose of this study is to promote interdisciplinary cooperation and enrich the dimension and content of modern Buddhology. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、前言 203
二、「重殺戒」構成要件及其相應處罰分析 204
(一)客觀構成要件 204
1.行為主體 204
2.行為客體 205
3.行為手段 207
4.行為結果 209
(二)主觀構成要件 210
1.行為人之故意意思 210
2.行為人之認識能力 210
(三)「重殺戒」之「罪」與「罰」 211
三、「重殺戒」所涉法理分析 212
(一)是人：人之始期判斷 212
(二)人想：認知障礙與認知錯誤 213
1.認知障礙 213
2.認識錯誤 214
(1)行為錯誤 215
(2)客體錯誤 216
甲、等價客體錯誤 216
乙、不等價客體錯誤 217
3.認識不確定 217
(三)起殺心：意志的發動，故意有責，故意不罰 218
(四)興方便：犯戒行為之法律質性 220
1.「重殺戒」成立「直接正犯」 221
2.「重殺戒」成立「間接正犯」 221
3.「重殺戒」成立教唆犯 222
4.「重殺戒」成立幫助犯 223
(五)命斷：處罰既遂，並罰未遂 223
四、結論 224
|
|---|
| ISSN | 18133649 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 307 |
|---|
| Created date | 2020.03.18 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2020.03.18 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
