|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
竺法護是否修訂過T474？=Was T474 Revised by Dharmarakṣa? |
|
|
|
| Author |
Radich, Michael (著)=何書群 (au.)
;
劉勁松
;
林恕安
;
耿晴
;
鄭乃綺
;
萬金川
|
|---|
| Source |
佛光學報=Fo Guang Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.2 新5卷 |
|---|
| Date | 2019.07 |
|---|
| Pages | 15 - 38 |
|---|
| Publisher | 佛光大學佛教研究中心 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://cbs.fgu.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 宜蘭縣, 臺灣 [I-lan hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者為海德堡大學海德堡跨文化研究中心教授 |
|---|
| Keyword | 電腦文獻學=computational philology; 藏經文本歸屬=attributions of canonical texts; 支謙=Zhi Qian; 竺法護=Dharmarakṣa; 《維摩詰經》=Vimalakīrti-nirdeśa |
|---|
| Abstract | 雖然現存於藏經中的《維摩詰經》（Vimalakīrti-nirdeśa，T474）歸屬於支謙（fl. 223－252），然前現代傳統與現代學界對於此經究竟應歸屬於支謙還是竺法護（Dharmarakṣa, fl. ca. 280－308）一直有所爭議。作者藉由電腦輔助方法發現了有關此問題相當豐富的內在證據，此篇論文以此為基礎，主張我們現存的文本是對於支謙原來底本的修訂，而修訂者為竺法護或是與竺法護圈子密切關聯之人。
In both the pre-modern tradition and modern scholarship, there has been controversy over whether the Vimalakīrti-nirdeśa (VKN) attributed in the present canon to Zhi Qian 支謙 (fl. 223-252), the Weimojie jing 維摩詰經 T474, is in fact by Zhi Qian or by Dharmarakṣa 竺法護 (fl. ca. 280-308). Using copious internal evidence discovered by computer-assisted methods developed by the author, this paper argues that our extant text is a revision of a Zhi Qian original text by Dharmarakṣa or someone very closely associated with Dharmarakṣa's circle. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 內部證據 21
引用書目 35 |
|---|
| ISSN | 24143006 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 1134 |
|---|
| Created date | 2020.04.20 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2020.04.20 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
