|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
How "Religion" Came to Be Translated as Shukyo: Shimaji Mokurai and the Appropriation of Religion in Early Meiji Japan=“Religion”の訳語が「宗教」となった経緯 : 島地黙雷と明治初期の日本における宗教概念の取り込み |
|
|
|
| Author |
Krämer, Hans Martin
|
|---|
| Source |
Japan Review: Journal of the International Research Center for Japanese Studies=日本研究=Nichibunken Japan Review=Bulletin of the International Research Center for Japanese Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | v.25 |
|---|
| Date | 2013.08 |
|---|
| Pages | 89 - 111 |
|---|
| Publisher | International Research Center for Japanese Studies=国際日本文化研究センター |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.nichibun.ac.jp/pc1/en/
|
|---|
| Location | 京都, 日本 [Kyoto, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Keyword | Postcolonial Theory; Religion; Buddhism; Conceptual History; Late Mito School; Aizawa Seishisai; Shimaji Mokurai; Shinto Ministry of Doctrine; Great Promulgation Campaign |
|---|
| Abstract | Investigations into the modern concept of "religion" in Japan usually stress its Western origins. According to this argument, shukyo was shaped following Christian, more precisely Protestant, notions of what religion was (and what not). Yet, in explaining why it was the word shukyo that eventually prevailed as the standard translation term for "religion," pointing to the West is of little help. Instead we have to turn to the earliest discussions about reliigion at the vety beginning of the Meiji period, in texts by Buddhist authors with domestic agendas little influenced by the Western notion of religion. It was rather the religious policy of the Meiji government, up to the mid-1870s deeply colored by the interests of the Shintoist group in the Bureau of Divinity and the Ministry of Doctrine, that prompted Buddhist authors, especially of the Jodo Shin persuasion, to theorize about religion and its relationship to the state. The most prominent of these was Shimaji Mokurai, who not only stressed the distinctness of religion from politics, but also came up with another conceptual opposition, one that would eventualy yield the term shukyo as expressing the realm of "religion." It is thisterminological opposition which will be traced genealogically in the second half of the article; and through this exercise it will be shown that the main motive for Buddhist authors in definining shukyo in the early Meiji years was to come to terms with the role of Shinto within the modern polity, i.e. a purely domestic concern hardly affected by Western cultural dominance. |
|---|
| Table of contents | "Civic Teachings" in the Meiji Period 91
"Civic Teachings" vs. "Sectarian Teachings": Shimaji Mokurai 91
"Governing and Teaching" for the Imperial Way: Early Meiji Imperial Edicts 96
The Tokugawa Period Legacy of "Civic Teachings" 98
The Early Tokugawa Period 98
The Late Mito School 99
Bakumatsu Shrine Policy in Yamaguchi 103
Conclusion 106 |
|---|
| ISSN | 09150986 (P); 24343129 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.15055/00000177 |
|---|
| Hits | 820 |
|---|
| Created date | 2021.02.03 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2021.02.03 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
